Originally posted by: Kinginthenorth9
Didn’t their so called group decide that they would deliberately lose to save Kash? Toh wohi toh kiya.
Biased sanchalak tab hota jab Manu actually biased decisions le ke Eijaz ko jeetata. He picked Vikas’s team as winners cuz they genuinely had done better in most tasks plus Manu’s group had already decided to let team Vikas win to save Kash. So it was a combo of both factors.
Aur Eijaz willingly agreed to be nominated in order to save Kash so it’s not like uski beizatti hogai cuz he himself decided to be nominated lol.
How would they have known that bb khel jaeye ge and will ask the winning team to also nominate one from their own team? lol
Once bb gave the other team that duty to it was very easy for someone as clever as Vikas to manipulate others in to nominating the person who he wants nominated lol
In fact I personally felt that Ruby goofed up by falling in Vikas’s trap and nominating Kash.
Her initial plan of nominating Vikas so he would be forced to use his joker card right away (thus wasting it) instead of at a later, crucial stage (where he would be nominated with Abhi for eg and saves himself with the card thus dooming Abhi for eviction) was the smart move.
Fortunately for Vikas, Jas was too dumb to understand the benefits of wasting Vikas’s card right away and she fell for Vikas’s words and Ruby (stupidly) relented and agreed to nominate Kash lol
Their target should have been Vikas who’s a much bigger threat to them (and no one’s ally but himself) than Kash jo aaj nahi toh kal waise bhi eliminate hojaeygi lol
And I’m not saying Vikas nominate hota toh evict hojata cuz he wouldn’t have. He would have been forced to use the joker card to save himself. Uska card waste hojaata without any serious consequences for the other housemates including Rubynav and Jas.
@bold - I feel for you King - having to state the obvious 😆
And yeah - totally agreed. Vikas played his team like a fiddle - woh jaisa bhi ho (and he's hella annoying), they're no match for his grasp of this game.
