Rubina's Logic

I can't be the only one who agrees with Rubina's logic, right? If a pair of shoes is considered one item, then Shalwar-Kameez bhi toh ek hi item hua na. Saying you can wear the Kameez with some other pants or the Salwar with some other top is like saying you can wear one shoe each from different pairs. Nobody wants to look like a clown.

She was trying to help the HMs by finding loopholes and sab uspe hi chadd gaye. Bewakufi.

And seniors ne aag laga di by saying "aapne ye bola toh ab ek shoe will be counted as one item". What was the point of doing this? Gaslighting, bas.

Originally posted by: redamancy

I can't be the only one who agrees with Rubina's logic, right? If a pair of shoes is considered one item, then Shalwar-Kameez bhi toh ek hi item hua na. Saying you can wear the Kameez with some other pants or the Salwar with some other top is like saying you can wear one shoe each from different pairs. Nobody wants to look like a clown.

She was trying to help the HMs by finding loopholes and sab uspe hi chadd gaye. Bewakufi.

And seniors ne aag laga di by saying "aapne ye bola toh ab ek shoe will be counted as one item". What was the point of doing this? Gaslighting, bas.

I’m more annoyed with Abhinav. Rubina was always right. She had an excellent point to kick up a fight, while people are fighting over who ate more sauce. 😆

Most of the Freshers are quite short -sighted . Do they even think beyond bootlicking the seniors? 😆

Rubina's point was beneficial for them and whomsoever had supported her against Seniors would've got chance to show their ability to take a stand .

Rubina's execution of her idea fell flat because of lack of support.

Her argument was valid , but she was not able to persuade her own team

She was actually being the sensible one. They mentioned that this has been discussed before but I never saw it so not sure what the details were of that discussion. She was absolutely right as she was trying to find a loophole just as the seniors have been doing. So if Shukla says he read the rules for a task and so and so isn't mentioned that means he can do it, that's all good but how dare she try to find a loophole!

I felt bad for her because all the other contestants did not comprehend her point completely or just did not have the spine to stand up for themselves. Eijaz disappointed me the most, he was not even ready to listen to her.

The seniors, for the most part, are being bullies. They keep saying we are here to help and we won't get anything out of this. I call bull on this, they are being paid that is why they are here.

Finally, someone thinks like me. Infact, I find Rubina very sensible. She doesn't boot lick anyone. She stands up for herself. I liked how she doesn't encourage Sidharth Shukla's or anyone else's nonsense as well.

I liked Abhinav's point as well. He isn't spoon feeding her. Just, trying to explain when it's necessary. That's all.

Originally posted by: SoPunk

I’m more annoyed with Abhinav. Rubina was always right. She had an excellent point to lick up a fight, while people are fighting over who ate more sauce. 😆

I can see what you are trying to say. I read your other posts about this. Abhinav should have at least said * something * to the seniors and others but he was just keeping quiet and laughing along with them. But maybe thats how they (Abhinav & Rubina) have planned to play their game. Also, I think I might have a soft spot for Abhinav. I like him & Rubina the most now. My opinion is subject to change, though. 😆

🤣🤣🤣 @ Bold.

Originally posted by: I-Got-You

Most of the Freshers are quite short -sighted . Do they even think beyond bootlicking the seniors? 😆

Rubina's point was beneficial for them and whomsoever had supported her against Seniors would've got chance to show their ability to take a stand .

Rubina's execution of her idea fell flat because of lack of support.

Her argument was valid , but she was not able to persuade her own team

YES! I so badly wanted someone to support Rubi and speak up against the seniors.

And IMO Rubina did do a good job at explaining it. She even used an example, read the rule book. Bechari ne bahaut mehnat ki. 😆 Even I was convinced. The other Freshers just didn't want to listen. They kept saying "yeh discussion already ho chuka hai" bla bla. Arey ho chuka hai toh phirse karo na. Persuade the seniors. At least you'll get more luxury items. Gadhe sabke sab!

Originally posted by: I-Got-You

Most of the Freshers are quite short -sighted . Do they even think beyond bootlicking the seniors? 😆

Rubina's point was beneficial for them and whomsoever had supported her against Seniors would've got chance to show their ability to take a stand .

Rubina's execution of her idea fell flat because of lack of support.

Her argument was valid , but she was not able to persuade her own team

Exactly she was talking in favour of the housemates but the housemates are taking these seniors too seriously ...

Yes these seniors are making rules but housemates are allowed to question their rules if they are illogical...

Abhinav was being realistic though, there’s no point of being right if it ultimately does not serve you. He knows the housemates won’t back them and also that seniors will never admit defeat. But he should not stop her infront of others rather later advise her.

I wish they didn’t come together for this reason, they have so much more to lose. We don’t know what ugly things BB will try to create between them and the public too will dissect every aspect of them. It’s tough.

Eijaz’s jumping jack routine was so so cringe, if I was rubina i would have lost my shit.

Also Gauhar saying they are not there to cause trouble or fights where as Hina and Sid have been shown on various occasions discussing how they can trouble the housemates