Bollywood: the rot within, and the glitz outside - By Shobhaa De - Page 7

Originally posted by: zoinks

No wonder why actresses even in their prime used to have EMA with big names.

In the old days, it used to be alcohol and sexual abuse. Women were the main victims, with little or no control over how they were treated. Those who survived the ordeal generally had the support of the big heroes and producers who provided ‘protection’ — for a price, of course.

What Big B did to Amrita Singh, if true, was plain sexual harassment.

What did he do now???

https://youtu.be/uQAw1s-X4QQ?t=19

Originally posted by: Nova19

Ah the “lovely” Shobha De. Long live the queen of the innuendo and blind item. But maybe it’d be better to call her a weather vane, smoothly turning whatever way the wind blows.

During the tumultuous Kangana Ranaut-Hrithik Roshan public war, I had backed Kangana—rightly or wrongly. I was told Hrithik was most miffed, as was his father, Rakesh, someone I have known for decades. ...

Hrithik stayed miffed....

. He overwhelmed us all with his words of praise and encouragement for Anandita....

Why bring in Hritik in a Kangana related thread (just like how she drags Hrithik in every topic she is speaking off)?

Of course I hate Shobha Dey. She is the mother of Masand.

But here, she is probably speaking about KJo (while blaming the blind culture, also release a blind 😀).
I agree with her partially. (Whatever Kangana exposed on drugs in Bollywood was a open secret). I am doubtful about the positive things she speaks about Bollywood (Really does good and kind hearted people exist in Bollywood?). But in general, I won’t take this woman seriously. Least of it I care what she spoke about Hrithik.

You know Kangana is right when someone from the completely opposite end of the political spectrum, from an entirely different generation is agreeing with her.

Originally posted by: Thatgirl16

What did he do now???

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/post/48784174

Originally posted by: Aanandaa

What the heck is this Raindrop PR? How come I am not getting paid when I am trying my best to be in every Kangana topic? bhot nainsaafi. :(

People are getting paid??? And I’ve been doing this for free for years!!!

Originally posted by: flipfl0p

Why bring in Hritik in a Kangana related thread (just like how she drags Hrithik in every topic she is speaking off)?

Of course I hate Shobha Dey. She is the mother of Masand.

But here, she is probably speaking about KJo (while blaming the blind culture, also release a blind 😀).
I agree with her partially. (Whatever Kangana exposed on drugs in Bollywood was a open secret). I am doubtful about the positive things she speaks about Bollywood (Really does good and kind hearted people exist in Bollywood?). But in general, I won’t take this woman seriously. Least of it I care what she spoke about Hrithik.

This is actually a Shobha De thread defending a televised Kangana rant in which Kangana made several claims about a divorced actor who thinks he is a superhero and his ex-wife. Forgive me for assuming most people would think that was Hrithik and Sussanne. Shobha here wrote nothing Kang claimed was a lie or exaggeration which one would think would include her claims about the actor and his ex wife. In answer to your question, I didn’t drag Hrithik in - Kangana did. When she stops, I will too.

Originally posted by: Anjalika01

You know Kangana is right when someone from the completely opposite end of the political spectrum, from an entirely different generation is agreeing with her.

Shobha supported her rubbish in 2016 - back when Kangana herself was from the completely opposite end of the political spectrum 😉.

Dunno much about Shobha De except the fact that she looks really manly due to surgeries and stuff. But what she said is true.

Originally posted by: LoveAnny

Even I dated three guys. People don't jump into relationship just after they meet you know 😆I didn't have idea any idea that dating makes a guy womanizer! Even walking out from a potential partner doesn't make a guy womanizer also. And where do you even noticed me cheering her? Everyone knows she is a nutcase but there are certain things which are true also. I asked that member to not misquote the word 'womanizer' as she didn't use it. Simple.

3 guys don't count as 'many' so no comparison with your case. That woman is smart so she would never use the word 'womanizer' but that's the image she painted of him...that he is guy who dated many women before and walked out on all of them. Why did she even stress on 'it's a known fact'? And I also had no idea that dating many women and walking out on all of them makes a guy a majnu who's looking for sacha pyar.

LoveAnny sorry the cheering part wasn't for you actually but for the posts on Page 1.