SSR Case Thread #3 - ALL UPDATES/DISCUSSIONS HERE *DT Note pg122* - Page 25

^^

But as per news her postmortem happened after 48 hrs passed ...

As per PM report she had private injuries ...

Let CBI starts the investigation then all truth ll out regarding both unusual deaths

Just have to say one thing

Such a hypocracy

When people were blaming Rhea how conveniently they wrote articles making it state issue saying why to blame Bengali women if they could do anything they can remove mysgony from male dominated society

But now they are conveniently blaming a state saying culture of bihar to blame family

Such a hypocrite

They blame the family saying they did not care when he was suffering. Are you people really gone blind with feminism??

That girl was just 2-3 months old in his life but took over everything .just a couple of hour after his death we see articles praising her as she has suffered slot. Can't we see who looks like opportunist here

Originally posted by: asmi_joya

Women are holier than thou. They have the right to spend their partners' money for leisure even when the partner is extremely sick. You see then the whole narrative of I am an independent woman goes to the dustbins.

We are living in this world.

No we are not living in this world. No one truly believes that women are always right except 5 sjw on the internet. In fact the ground reality is just the opposite. So Why are you countering the ignorant baseless ramblings of the article with sweeping generalisation of your own?

I personally 'think' that rhea took advantage of a person who was going through mental issues. But the tv coverage is horrendous. The anchors are stating their options as facts and the narrative is deeply patriarchal.

So the article does point that out correctly. But then falters and makes assumptions that sushant didn't love anyone in his family except his mom. Or that they had issues with rhea just bec she was modern. And the article basically is guilty of the same shoddy journalism it is accusing of others.

One can only wonder what sort of family environment this writer comes from to write something so disgusting.

Sush was so close to his sisters, he left engineering and his family let him follow his dreams. In which family is the brother in law so involved in the well being of his wife's brother?

Sush family not a typical family. Sush lived with Ankita for 6 years. His family never had any problem with Ankita. His family kept in touch with Ankita even after the break up. His father called Ankita when he was unable to contact his son. Sush sister addresses Ankita as baby. If they had problems with son's girlfriends they would not have kept contact with Ankita. Ankita was his girlfriend for the longest time. If they could accept Ankita for a long time then why could they not accept Rhea who was with him for just one year? Sush family should sue the journalist.

If girlfriend's are frowned upon, why wasn't Ankita or Kriti frowned upon?

Bhatts said that Rhea told them that Sush house is haunted. The narratives came from Bhatt not Sush family.

Originally posted by: Thatgirl16

If girlfriend's are frowned upon, why wasn't Ankita or Kriti frowned upon?

That's my question. Both Ankita and Kirti are actresses and in no way fit to be a traditional middle class format bahu.

Wow at the generalisation and stereotypes in an attempt to malign to family to portray her like a damsel in distress. While I agree that it's not right to say with utmost confidence that Sushant can't have depression - something that can happen to anyone - because of his usual happy self,

1) Mumbai Police claimed that Rhea herself talked about haunted homes : "She was interrogated for close to nine hours... Rhea Chakraborty said that Sushant Singh Rajput's former Bandra home was haunted. "That’s what I felt and even Sushant was disturbed while we were staying there," she told the cops" - from a HT article.

2) Smita, Sushant's friend, claims the same - that Rhea talked about his house being haunted and of her 17-year old friend's spirit harming people that harm her.

3) People at his Pawna farmhouse confirmed that Rhea used to do poojas with lemons and without idols.

How can you not expect his family to be creeped out and bring that aspect with those kind of rumours floating?

4) If they had been so conservative about Sushant's "independent" choices/only endorse their own choices and arranged marriages, why would they have absolutely no problem with Ankita (in fact they adore her) and Kriti but only with Rhea?

5) Sushant's dad had to resort to contacting his ex-girlfriend to know about his son's whereabouts because he was changing sims a hundred times, and that never happened before he met Rhea. How do you expect the family not to suspect her?

6) When did they say he never made mistakes? His brother-in-law literally accused him of bad choices in terms of company.

And I'll ask this again and again, WHY would Rhea turn away from CBI after being so keen on an investigation happening just weeks before she got accused, had she not been guilty? She has immense faith in God and in the judiciary right? Why was she running away from ED?

If you criticize Rhea, then it's a witch hunt. But anything can be said about the family and that's okay. Such fake feminism makes me wanna barf.

Also the whole 'family not liking son's girlfriend' comment will be made by a totally delusional person, especially after Ankita-Kriti's bond with his family.

The sudden surge of Rhea fans is hilarious to say the least. They're blind to anything against Rhea and claim to be seeing "both sides of the story " . Atleast don't pretend to be impartial when you clearly aren't.