Except abetment canNOT be proven in the terms you just listed. It has to be straightforward based on evidence (suicide note) or based on immediate circumstances such as harrassment by in laws or partner or someone close to him- and all of this has to be proved, again with evidence.
Building a case of abetment on "Masand's blinds" or :not getting inroads into the inner circle which caused him anguish" is NOT enough for an abetment charge, legally speaking. Not only is it a weak basis, it is non existent. The case being "oh they put out bad press against him which broke him", which will once again put the onus on his mental health, NOT on Masand or whoever Kangana wants to blame. Competition, career rivalry, sabotage is NOT abetment purely in terms of the law. So whether he had mental health issues or not, it'l then be dug up via interrogations of his doctors or sub peona
Not dictating what you should think but atleast WAIT for the investigation to be over. Please stop using these terms so loosely. Justice is served according to the law and not according to what you THINK is right. Otherwise we would all be kangaroo courts.
One more thing, Jessica Lal's case was fought by her sister who loved her dearly. Similarly so was Nirbhaya's by her family. Who is fighting SSR's? Swamy, Kangana..people who didnt even know him! Sushant's brother in law is also not clamoring for CBI enquiry. Should tell you everything about people's real motives!
His family is not some bechara clan. If they thought there was something fishy, they would have done something or said it.
0