~| Whatever you want to argue about |~ - Page 103

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Arjuna already spent a year with her in women's quarters. I don't believe Virat had a choice. It was either Arjuna or his son, no one else could marry Uttara no matter how many times anyone protested nothing happened.

Virat didn't even talk about marrying his daughter to Arjuna because of this reason, He asked Arjuna to marry her and Arjuna suggested his son Abhimanyu marries Virat's daughter. Virat asked him why doesn't Arjuna wish to marry her? It is then Arjuna replied that He treated her like a daughter when he lived there, therefore he can't marry her and there's no difference between a daughter and a daughter in law

Virat doesn't mention what you are saying

And if Arjuna's son had to marry, if not him then it would be Srutakirti, Iravan and Babruvahana, why would Arjuna fix marriage of Krishna's son saying Krishna's son Abhimanyu is like Arjuna?

Subhadra is described as Abhimanyu's mother, unless we incest upon Krishna being his biological father, I don't see how it is possible when the epic is clear about this -

Then Subhadra, the favourite sister of Kesava, gave birth to an illustrious son, like Puloma's daughter, (the queen of heaven) bringing forth Jayanta. And the son that Subhadra brought forth was of long arms, broad chest, and eyes as large as those of a bull. That hero and oppressor of foes came to be called Abhimanyu. And the son of Arjuna, that grinder of foes and bull among men, was called Abhimanyu because he was fearless and wrathful. And that great warrior was begotten upon the daughter of the Satwata race by Dhananjaya, like fire produced in a sacrifice from within the sami wood by the process of rubbing

About Krishna being called Abhi's father because he raised him then Pandu didn't raise his sons, Pandava's real fathers didn't raise them, Pandavas didn't raise their sons, Draupadi didn't raise her sons, Subhadra did, why isn't Subhadra called mother of UpaPandavas? Or why Dristadymya isn't called father of Upapandavas?

"And then Dhananjaya, the son of Kunti, accepted Virata's daughter of faultless limbs on behalf of his son by Subhadra. And that great king, Yudhishthira, the son of Kunti, who stood there like Indra, also accepted her as his daughter-in-law. And having accepted her, the son of Pritha, with Janardana before him, caused the nuptial ceremonies to be performed of the illustrious son of Subhadra

Yudi is called Father in law of Uttara too, doesn't make him father of Abhimanyu

So the "Krishna's son" could be Arjuna too

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Haan but normal marriage n abduction marriage are different na.

She was a kid just out of an abduction trauma, how pleasant that relation could be

She was definitely not kid , u r thinking from kaliyug time frame that's why u think she was a kid.

Girls use 2 marry at d age of 15 or 16 only maybe more less than that . Yes she was very young & she became mom at young age but she is not referred as kid anywhere

My own mother married when she was 17 yrs & grandmother married at 16.

Infact most bal vivaah were done in young age.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

No Prativindhya was left in Ekchakranagri from where Arjun brought him later.

But why would Prativindhya go to Ekchakranagri? Pandavas stayed there before Draupadi Swayamwar and Ekchakranagri wasn't a tourist spot to go there to play. So might be Prativindhya was there even before Draupadi Swayamwar

Yes i don't think there is any issue about who was the father everywhere it is mentioned yudhishtra to be his daddy. I think panchali was not his mommy. He was born before panchali s Swamyvaar.

Originally posted by: Andy3456

Who😈

In text he is said to be his mother s favourite ☺️😈

Originally posted by: Krishnapanchali

Yes they did. Maybe they were pandavas son with other wives who drapaudi adopted.

Originally posted by: Krishnapanchali

I think i know who 😈

Well Abhimanyu was favourite of everyone , he took this quality from mamashree🤣

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Haan but normal marriage n abduction marriage are different na.

She was a kid just out of an abduction trauma, how pleasant that relation could be

It wasn't an abduction marriage, Arjuna abducted her, he was going to Indraprastha but was stopped by Yadavas and brought back to Dwaraka, So Subhadra was untouched by him, They got married in Dwaraka, was it on same day or after a week? I don't know but Subhadra was untouched and she could have said no to marrying Arjuna because she was in Dwaraka and her brothers stopped Arjuna before he could go to IP. It was more like arranged marriage than rape as people were trying to prove

All girls were young including Draupadi and Uttara

Did they ask Draupadi if she wanted to marry 5 Pandavas? It is about her consent

Who asked Uttara if she wanted to marry Abhimanyu?

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

When draupadi came out supposedly from fire she would had been supposedly near by 13 as she is often termed Kumari chaapi , in her swayamber she would be near by 16 . Draupadi was not of 25 or 30 when she married

I don't know u read or not one man from West bengal case against lord Ram for marrying sita at her age was 6 during her swayamber. He presented full proof about it

Definitely not 25-30 but she was over the age of maturity around 16-17, not a kid who wasn't even of marriageable age. Aside going by her actions, it doesn't seem she could be made to accept what she didn't want, although as I said I don't know if or not Draupadi was Ok with Polyandrous marriage.

@Bold that I have read that, it's not something new, going by long time

They give it by the fact that she stayed for ____ years before Vanvaas and then 14 years Vanwaas and then xyz years after that etc, like we do. But her being 6 would mean Shrutkirti would be 4, could marriage happen then? Such marriages weren't allowed as per religion

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Definitely not 25-30 but she was over the age of maturity around 16-17, not a kid who wasn't even of marriageable age. Aside going by her actions, it doesn't seem she could be made to accept what she didn't want, although as I said I don't know if or not Draupadi was Ok with Polyandrous marriage.

@Bold that I have read that, it's not something new, going by long time

They give it by the fact that she stayed for ____ years before Vanvaas and then 14 years Vanwaas and then xyz years after that etc, like we do. But her being 6 would mean Shrutkirti would be 4, could marriage happen then? Such marriages weren't allowed as per religion

Na we frnds say shrutkirti was -1🤣🤣🤣acc 2 that person