Originally posted by: Wistfulness
No, he wasn't.
I remember that Krishna also used the term napunsak which was totally unnecessary in the scene. The makers of this serial were so obsessed with that word.
The reluctance never looked convincing to me because the relation between Bhishma and Arjuna was never developed. Another issue was the acting.
yes he did use that napunsuk thing but more than that the tone in which he spoke to parth was so annoying and unnecessary. They dint have to make him so rude before the geeta gyan. And Shaheers voice modulation was bad in the pre gaata gyan scenes. And they did show the 5 brothers bonding with bhishma if not arjun -bhishma separately so i do understand the reluctance even then. but Krishnas rudeness with arjun is not understandable. it spoiled the next scene and essence of geeta gyan to me.
They did so well with the scene where arjun chooses krishna over his army and then this
Edited by naq5 - 5 years ago