Divorce Isn't A Solution HERE! - Page 4

There is no provision for divorce in Christianity.Marriage is one of the seven sacraments for Christians.Also Christians believe in only one birth and one death and marriage is considered inseparable.

Originally posted by: -beena-

There is no provision for divorce in Christianity.Marriage is one of the seven sacraments for Christians.Also Christians believe in only one birth and one death and marriage is considered inseparable.

Thank you, even I just wanted to clarify this.

There is no divorce in Christianity. The term divorce is legal/ civil term nothing to do with religion.

Originally posted by: ArVi-licious

Thank you, even I just wanted to clarify this.

There is no divorce in Christianity. The term divorce is legal/ civil term nothing to do with religion.

Thank you! Some one agrees to not mix religion and civil laws. It's same like comparing/ mixing state and church/ temple.

Laws and religion should be separate. I mean India is going through bad time right now, why because religion is accepted into laws.

I am a Hindu or in the TM's case a liberal Hindu and I support divorce. But think twice before marrying. That would be good too. But the whole argument of religion and any person not seeking divorce seems stretched.

Originally posted by: -Mayu-

Thank you! Some one agrees to not mix religion and civil laws. It's same like comparing/ mixing state and church/ temple.

Laws and religion should be separate. I mean India is going through bad time right now, why because religion is accepted into laws.

I am a Hindu or in the TM's case a liberal Hindu and I support divorce. But think twice before marrying. That would be good too. But the whole argument of religion and any person not seeking divorce seems stretched.

No one is saying no divorce

Divorce should be there only in extreme circumstances like physical abuse and substance abuse

Rest not needed.dont make marriage a mockery

U r not marrying civil marriage way just by signing papers

U r marrying in Hindu Vedic way offering to fire .so religion also comes in to marriage in a moral way

Originally posted by: Thimag1314

If God give us the option to go back to past life,i will choose to remain single🥳

Me too .if God gives me a chance getting me to past .I will be single for ever .

I will not marry bcos of family pressure or compulsion

Once married all kinds of compulsions come up moral family etc etc and it's hard to shed u r responsibilities

U should be committed to life long hmm.u will become a sacrificial lamb .that's my perspective on marriage

I advice being single to every one unless and until u r too much convinced that this is the one I am waiting all my life for ..only when u get that feeling marry ..

Originally posted by: ArVi-licious

Thank you, even I just wanted to clarify this.

There is no divorce in Christianity. The term divorce is legal/ civil term nothing to do with religion.

Only in Islam and Judaism there is thalak concept

In Christianity and Hinduism there's no divorce term

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

No one is saying no divorce

Divorce should be there only in extreme circumstances like physical abuse and substance abuse

Rest not needed.dont make marriage a mockery

U r not marrying civil marriage way just by signing papers

U r marrying in Hindu Vedic way offering to fire .so religion also comes in to marriage in a moral way

The post screamed that the concept of divorce was not known to Hindu religion. Divorce should definitely be in those circumstances but again isn't abuse and infidelity abstract?

You cannot preach religion and be practical. It's Either Or, strictly my POV. Because the concept of religion is very different. I detest some aspects of Hindu religion and those are some aspects which as women we have to oppose.

Well even though you are pronounced married just by the priest, though you have to have it registered to make it legal.

Originally posted by: -Mayu-

The post screamed that the concept of divorce was not known to Hindu religion. Divorce should definitely be in those circumstances but again isn't abuse and infidelity abstract?

You cannot preach religion and be practical. It's Either Or, strictly my POV. Because the concept of religion is very different. I detest some aspects of Hindu religion and those are some aspects which as women we have to oppose.

Well even though you are pronounced married just by the priest, though you have to have it registered to make it legal.

See there is no concept in sanathaba Dharma which u should detest .it gave max freedom to women unlike islam Christianity or Judaism

Perhaps u r talking about Manu who wrote all sxhit in 700 a.d .that MAnu is fake MAnu..it's proved by some .

After Islam started making roots in a destructive way some Hindu scholars started regressive concepts in sanathana Dharma to protect women from islamic Invaders

Sanathana Dharma has no regressive practises at all .there was nothing like child marriage ..there was no sati ..burning of women .women were educated

There was option to remain single for both women and men through out their life .

See Mahabharata ..no one had child marriage .no woman forcibly married .woman had choice in marriage .every woman was educated ..queen had their say in running the state along with king .

There was widow remarriage too .vichitra veerya wives had option to go back to their kingdom and marry

That's why satyavathi begged them to stay ..she did not order them

Even satyavathi had option to marry again .she was offered marriage by some king .but she refused .

There was equality .men and women both had polygamy practise ..unlike Islam ..which was partial .

Originally posted by: -Mayu-

The post screamed that the concept of divorce was not known to Hindu religion. Divorce should definitely be in those circumstances but again isn't abuse and infidelity abstract?

You cannot preach religion and be practical. It's Either Or, strictly my POV. Because the concept of religion is very different. I detest some aspects of Hindu religion and those are some aspects which as women we have to oppose.

Well even though you are pronounced married just by the priest, though you have to have it registered to make it legal.

Yes u first marry according to Vedic practise and make it legal .it's not the other way

So religion is mixed with marriage .. morally though not legally

I do agree with most of your points Anushka. But one thing I would beg to differ is that divorce isn't necessarily regressive. Relationships that bind two people together in a loveless relation that lacks trust, respect and subjects one of the partners to endless abuse is regressive. Divorce may not be a part of religion but it was brought in force in Hindu Marriage Act. For those suffering abuse all their life, subjected to humiliation it is liberating. So I am not personally against it.

However in Ronakshi case, divorce is not a solution. So agree there. Coz we have two people who are capable of respecting and loving each other. Situations are messed up. I guess viewers are just pissed off with Sonakshi being tortured endlessly. They are frustrated. But in the end if makers show Rohit realise the truth then the very same viewers will start shipping Ronakshi and will hope they will sort out their differences 😊