Originally posted by: Bandwagon-er
Two things. Since there is a conflation of issues here.
1. If there was to be an attack on a nukkad college by masked goons. I would protest against that. I would laud deepika Padukone for supporting protests against that. So for me there is no difference in a nukkad college and JNU. I am against what happened in AMU, what happened in Jamia, what happened in IIT Kanpur, and what happened in JNU. They are all equal for me. I am against the government using under handed tactics and/or brute force to silence protestors. What the protestors were protesting is irrelevant (caa/NRC/fee hike/kashmir). So i don’t want to get into the debate of what would have been the best way to tackle the fee hike issue.
2. I (and i speak only for myself) feel much more strongly for certain issues than for others. For me a protest against caa/nrc is more sensitive and immediate than a protest against fee hike. I do agree with a fellow poster who said education should be free for all. I do think we need a centre of left party which can provide basic social amenities like health and education to all. But i feel that there are more immediate threats like the secular fabric of the country being destroyed that need urgent attention.
The protest had started in the name of fee hike but it is obvious now that the leftist agenda seems to be different
If the goons/attackers were masked how can anybody know the identity, but atmosphere is being created as if any leftist-communist entity cannot attack other students. These entities are known world over as the most intolerant ideologies. If it is not known who attacked then benifit of doubt should be given to all.
The protests against CAA are even more ridiculous. CAA does not threaten secular fabric in any way. It is for persecuted minorities in 3 Islamic countries. And funnily enough those countries don't have a problem with CAA.