Ok so my two cents on todayâs epi.
First and foremost the reason why ppl think itâs biased. Couldnât salman be just as passionate about Sidâs aggression being wrong like he was with Mahira? Also why is it logical to ask her to let go of the sack because Sid grabbed onto it? So what she shouldnât do her task, if thatâs the case then from now on they should all just let go the moment Sid comes in the picture. You can go soft on Sana on her obvious fake crying but why such a harsh response on Mahira, using words like nautanki.
The person who came out the best was Paras, loved how he stood his ground, from the beginning to the end. Even afterwards jab sabko Sunaya what the likes of Sid and asim do. Sid picking fights with people then claiming victim card and asim dragging Paraâs name into everything âyeh sab bachche hai jo main inko baith ke bataoga sabâ even at the end he was the one who probably got the coveted message: just ignore Shukla you guys have made him the spine of this show yourself. Itâs hard but they are gonna have to ignore, which is hard when Shukla does a fair amount of instigating himself.
Which brings me to Rashmi, loved her fiery response to asim saying the abusive words that she has heard out in front of Salman indirectly even calling out BBâs editing team too. Salmanâs expression weređ
But funniest was the end Himanshi-Sana issue. Sana crying đ€Łeven Salman didnât take her seriously.
Overall I get peopleâs frustration, Sidâs obvious aggression is not only being whitewashed but he is being painted as a victim. Paras pointed it out so well the reason shukla gets targeted is because he fights with everyone. No one is gonna take his shit silently, people will react but it will get shown as everyone is ganging up on him.