Originally posted by: EtherealRati
see the article maker compared the anurag 1 and anurag 2 in similar situations. The context was same for both anurag's .....they were trapped in a similar situation. It had nothing to do with bajaj.....she assumes the audience reading it does watch kzk and knows the context. The article is about how anurag for her proved to be the worst boyfriend. Its not like that the article maker has to be the last openion. It was open for discussion.....i can understand if you dint wish to defend....its a choice but putting remarks on the article maker is not done. Like i always say ....the forum is to discuss characters.....article maker has also given her pov on a character......we should keep it to the characters only.
No the journalist talked about situations that were not similar and the sequences of events that happened were also not similar. If we talk about situations then there are many instances where Anu2 had behaved better than Anu1. Don't get me wrong, mera kan pack chukatha Anu 1 ko spineless suna suna key. Lekin muge wo hamesha ek seeda saada acha lalhaka lagatha...Even now mujey Anu2 eysahi lagahey discounting the conspiracy to trap Bajaj thing.
I don't like making blanket statements. The situations are not similar here to what they have shown in S1 so its not correct to make generalized statements comparatively. I don't like comparing Anu1 to Anu2 because of the same reason. For me when situations are not the same why make judgments...I like Anu 2 better because of the charm and little nuances that Parth the actor brings. Not because I feel Anu1 was a bad person or so much lesser than Anu2.
