Arre bhai please Google Ranveer Singh Khilji performance reviews or even Padmaavat reviews and you'll easily find more than a dozen articles from across the world praising his performance and calling him the best thing in the film. Everyone knows this... why are you bothering to even refute this fact? Seems like Melisssa is totally right.
Critics didn't praise Ranveer because he looked like Khal Drogo or a barbarian king blah blah blah.. they praised him because of his *drum roll* ACTING 😆
And you're again wrong when you said that Ranveer's only performances considered NA worthy are BM and Padmaavat. He was brilliant in films like Lootera and Gully Boy too so he was definitely more deserving than Vicky and Ayushmann for URI and Andhadhun, respectively.
I consider Vicky and Ranveer to be the best actors right now but Vicky's performance in URI was not anything special (critics think so too) because there wasn't much scope to begin with given how poorly the character was written.
Also, I again reiterate what I've said before. Ranveer is versatile and is being touted as such because his character and film choices are very diverse. Changing your look is secondary lol even a kid would understand this fact. Also, when you play such distinct roles you would obviously look different in each film. I don't know what is sooo hard to understand about this 😆
According to your logic, Ranveer just changes his look in each film and voila critics call him a great actor? Bhai acting kaun karta hai fir? Bhansali? 😆
Not everyone can play themselves in every film like Varun, Ayushmann, Kartik, or RK being a man child in each film 🤣
Originally posted by: Luna46
Do you even know on what context I was speaking? This whole argument started because I claimed Ranveer changing looks in films doesn't make him a great actor. SH was questioning my claim by bringing other performances of Ranveer like BBB, DDD, Befikre where he didn't change look. But those performances were never considered award worthy even if they were critically acclaimed. Only BM and Padmaavat were because he changed looks in those. The whole "critically acclaimed" thing wasn't even used for Padmaavat, so I don't know where this national award thing is coming. I know whatever I'm saying will again fall in deaf ears, but if you actually want to understand, please again go through the replies to know what is actually being talked about. Don't just get triggered because your favourite is being bashed.
No one is ranting here darling. I'm not such a big fool to rant on an SH thread. I was just playing with him. I'm actually talking about your favourite after a long time and you losing your shit over that and even claiming that I get triggered the most here shows how much you are triggered by my posts. And yes, I consider him overrated and no award or critical acclaim can make me change my opinion unless I see it for myself. Every other actor from Khans to RK to Alia are bashed here and are called pathetic actors. None of their fandoms come to defend it all the time by using their awards or critical acclaim. Its only your fandom who can't accept your favourite not being considered the best by others.
Edited by mystic786 - 6 years ago
42