..::Doubts & Discussions about Historical facts::.. - Page 62

Originally posted by: Gem12

even i am telling everyone not to watch it at 8pm slot..watch it online..but not 8pm slot..

Originally posted by: Birdiee

Those who want to see a Farman issue by our beloved MUZ..

Here is the link..

http://oudl.osmania.ac.in/bitstream/handle/OUDL/2281/218761_Proceedings_Of_Meetings_Vol_VIII.pdf?sequence=2

Pg 169

Thanks Much for sharing this. From the serial JA , we will never get to see this.

cant view this,could u plz post written updates ,thanks.

Originally posted by: BharatVeerPutra

Akbar's turn to tolerance had VERY LITTLE to do with his wives or Harka bai from the solid evidence(contemporary chronicles)we have.
The real reason Akbar sought discourses on other religions was something else, recorded by his contemporaries but hidden by our secularists eager to cover up the truth his Hindu wives have nothing to do with religious liberalism if we go by contemporary chronicles.
In fact we have solid evidence from his contemporaries that over time he had for all practical purposes start doubting his own scholars teached practices , this happened later in his life. In his early life he was much of a jihadist fanatic as any other Muslim occupier of India.
The wars he waged against the only resistant Hindu kingdoms - Mewar and Gondwana - had all the characteristics of classic jihad ...Fatahnama-i-Chittor issued by him after the conquest of Chittor at Ajmer, the notorious fathnAmA-i-chittor which seculars find so hard to ever quote in verbatim, is prepered with Quranic verses, compares the battle of Chittor with jihads led by Prophet
1579 Akbar boasted that he was a great conqueror of Islam to the ruler of Turan, Abdullah Khan, in a letter
Akbar's reign was chronicled extensively by his court historian Abul Fazal in the books Akbarnama and Ain-i-akbari. Fazal gave a positive spin to Akbar's reign by glossing over uncomfortable facts of the emperor's reign related to his interaction with other communities of his empire, which has been repeated by numerous historians over the years. Other contemporary sources of Akbar's reign like the works of Badayuni, Shaikhzada Rashidi and Shaikh Ahmed Sirhindi were written outside of court influence and hence contain more authentic information and less flattery for Akbar.

thanks for the info 😊 so cvs are showing there own fantacies in the name of jodha akbar with there so called two year resarch how pathetic 👎🏼

Originally posted by: Akdhaparijatluv

😳😳😃

"New Interesting Article : Mosque of Mariam-Uz-Zamani in Lahore .
Click here to Read"

Ideally we should not confuse serial with history

The makers of the show has forgotten the importancee of rukiya sultan begum the fact is she was the daughter of the mughal saltnat and than a bahu,here shes shown as drug pedller what a shame,a daughter in law maybe sidelined will be revengful but not a daughter,and rukiya has no reason to do these kind of nasty things

Ruqaiyya Sultan Begum may have been close to Akbar, Jahangir and Shah Jahan. But she had no official importance, as can be gauged from the historical chronicles, which hardly mention her.