I feel that only 2 ppl r responsible 4 shramik's plight,One is Aryavardhan of course and the other ones r the shramiks themselves.
A king's duty is to see that his praja is loving happily without any problems.It's his duty to solve their problems.Unfortunately,AV hasn't fulfilled these duties.The shramiks r also his praja.He shld see that they r living happily but he spends all his time in his mahal enjoying all his riches and the status of being a king.š”If he would hv gone at least once to shramiko ki basti he would hv realized how pathetic their conditions are!Now why won't the shramiks revolt against him?They hv no other alternative except killing him.
The other one responsible is the shramik himself.Remember,long back pari and sakshi had gone to AV and had complained against jv to him.AV then ordered jv not to harrass pari and sakshi.Whenever we hv some problem,we go to the higher authority and complain so that our problems get solved.The shramiks do not know this or they are not taught to do so.When JV used to harass them,why didn't they complain against him to av?AV would hv definitely taken action against him.Even now when rudra harassed them they didn't complain against him.And then they say maharaj doesn't know our problems.How can he know when no one lets him know?
What r ur opinions?