Should Hrithik have been cast as Lord Ram in Ramayana? - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

25

Views

1.1k

Users

21

Likes

50

Frequent Posters

DivineAngel thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail + 2

Fantasy Force

Posted: 2 months ago
#21

Sai is getting 6 crores only while RK is getting 75 crores. How unfair is that. 

Clochette thumbnail
Visit Streak 365 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 2 months ago
#22

They indeed could have made it less costly with another actor as Ram, one who has the needed youthfullness and won't need additional CGI costs.

I agree with BI, that Hrithik has features that remind of Western gods (Greek/Roman/German)...and there would be extra-costs, too.

I wonder if the producer(s) even did auditions for another Ram...

Until now - baring the promotional pics - I don't have a good feeling for the project.

Edited by Clochette - 2 months ago
roni_berna thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 2 months ago
#23

I like to see Hrithik only in Dhoom kinda characters riding the bike. He looks so hot smiley42smiley43

oh_nakhrewaali thumbnail
Posted: 2 months ago
#24

No one can beat him in that dept... Meanwhile Ram Charan in his Ram look in RRR: Haan yeh kar lo pehle😮‍💨

Zilan thumbnail
Anniversary 6 Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 0 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail

Sci-Fi Squad

Posted: 2 months ago
#25

After the prabas disaster they should have taken the hint and not make this movie at the first place. HR is any day a much better choice than overrated RK

Girlabouttown thumbnail
Anniversary 16 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 2 months ago
#26

Yes I agree

Top