I'm happy I gave up on watching this. A mother and child are being auctioned off as commodities. Why Diljeet is the villain and Angad is the hero is beyond me. After abusing his wife, getting her pregnant, and throwing her out while she was still pregnant, Angad claimed the child he had no part in raising for 7 long years and threatened to take him away from Panesar. His family then abducted Akir, imprisoned Sahiba , and he secretly fled with Akir. Diljeet reared Akir for seven years while also saving the lives of the mother and child. Why is Diljeet's outburst invalid? Not everyone has the unconditional love of Sahiba, who gives everything to one man and continues to love him despite his perpetual abuse.
What gives Diljeet fewer rights than Angad? Why is Diljeet the bad guy if Angad can assault people recklessly and claim a child he abandoned seven years ago? Why is Diljeet the worse one if Angad and his mother can imprison Sahiba for their crimes and leave in the middle of the night with her child when they kicked her out years ago?
We must acknowledge that Yashraj Baweja and Diljeet are byproducts of persistent cruelty by Brars, just like any rational person would be. Because Sahiba has exceptional capacity to tolerate cruelty, her agony never ended. Had it been any other lady, they would have tortured Angad to death long back.
comment:
p_commentcount