Originally posted by: Firefly_shines
Was genuinely curious about this so thought of sharing my views.
Seeing comments criticising Garvita’s acting and calling it cringe made me realise one thing, that no matter who played Ruhi’s part - a newbie, experienced actor, national award winner or samriddhi, it was bound to get criticised. Yes hypothetically had Samriddhi been playing Ruhi’s character, people would have been extra critical about her acting. Coz it’s not about the actor or her acting skills, it’s about the character Ruhi and the hate associated with it.
I have usually noticed comments overhyping and overrating main leads acting skills while being extra critical and judgemental for the PL. While it may be true most of the time, it’s not always the case.
Imo every actors has their own plus and minus points. While there are some emotions they can easily emote, they require practice for the others.
In this gen, Pratiksha was a newbie with zero acting skills but still managed to look decent in non emotional light hearted scenes with her family. In her comparison Garvita is 100 times better as she has already worked in this industry. Samriddhi is no doubt a very good actress but personally feel she can improve the arguing and shouting scenes as it goes ott and her voice becomes shrill.
In this gen Shehzada improved impressively in few months. On the other hand Rohit is a very good looking actor but appears stiff in some scenes.
edited for gen 3 actor comparisons
I agree with Samriddhi point. At first, she was really good. But now that the actors have changed, her ott acting is increasingly noticeable especially when she shouts and says dialogues fast.Maybe she's trying to outshine Garvita and Rohit, but it's not working well.
comment:
p_commentcount