These type of arguments man has been using it throughout history... Nothing new
"Using crooked arguments in reasoning, raising irrelevant objections, isolating a word or a sentence from its context, subjecting it to hair-splitting and making it the basis of doubts and accusations, misconstruing words from their true sense and intention so that neither should one understand the meaning oneself nor let others understand it. Such a way of dispute is adopted only by those whose difference of opinion is based on ill-will and malice. If a well-intentioned opponent disputes a point, he does so for the sake of arriving at the truth, and wants to be satisfied through discussion whether his own point of view is correct. Such a discussion is engaged in quest of truth and not for refutation. Contrary to this, the real purpose of the malicious opponent is not to understand anything nor to help others to understand, but to degrade and humiliate the other man; he joins a discussion only with the intention that he would not let the other man carry his point. That is why he never faces the real problems but launches his attacks only on the irrelevant issues."Edited by YourCat - 5 months ago
I am not doubting anyone....but is it true that Jiah's sister got engaged 20 days after Jiah's death ?? Like how??
The courts accusations are wrong. But maybe the sister didn't have a bond with the victim? Uski marzi, she might have planned it for a while and wanted to go ahead with it.
Of course it is something not expected, but agar koi pyar ya care nahi toh why would they postpone their big day.
Topic started by SriRani
Last replied by crazygul