Udariyaan | Episode Discussion Thread #91

shareShare facebook twitter
Posted: 1 months ago

Image

Image

Image

Please abide by the IF Rules & Regulations at all times. 

No bashing of actors or discussing their personal lives. This EDT is only for Episode Discussion!

Permission given by the Channel Mod.-- Mnx12

Posted: 1 months ago

Image 

 EDT#01         EDT#02        EDT#03        EDT#04      

 EDT#05         EDT#06        EDT#07        EDT#08

 EDT#09         EDT#10        EDT#11        EDT#12

 EDT#13         EDT#14        EDT#15        EDT#16

 EDT#17         EDT#18        EDT#19        EDT#20

 EDT#21         EDT #22       EDT#23        EDT#24

 EDT#25         EDT#26        EDT#27        EDT#28

 EDT#29         EDT#30        EDT#31        EDT#32

 EDT#33         EDT#34        EDT#35        EDT#36

 EDT#37         EDT#38        EDT#39        EDT#40

 EDT#41         EDT#42        EDT#43        EDT#44

 EDT#45         EDT#46        EDT#47        EDT#48

 EDT#49         EDT#50        EDT#51        EDT#52

 EDT#53         EDT#54        EDT#55        EDT#56

 EDT#57         EDT#58        EDT#59        EDT#60

 EDT#61         EDT#62        EDT#63        EDT#64

 EDT#65         EDT#66        EDT#67        EDT#68

 EDT#69         EDT#70        EDT#71        EDT#72

 EDT#73         EDT#74        EDT#75        EDT#76

 EDT#77         EDT#78        EDT#79        EDT#80

 EDT#81         EDT#82        EDT#83        EDT#84

 EDT#85         EDT#86        EDT#87        EDT#88 

 EDT#89         EDT#90

Edited by FieryLioness - 14 days ago
Posted: 1 months ago

It's funny how some people wanted positive ekam to become negative or grey but same people just can't digest already grey Advait becoming more negative. Good person ko bad banana h but already bad person ko aur bad bante nai sakte. They r comparing angad-fateh character change to advait-ekam. According to them, bad Advait will make ekam look good. Ulta they wanted bad ekam to make Advait look good. They themselves wanted fateh-angad character change for advait-ekam but makers did opposite. They made already good ekam better n already bad Advait worse which is totally digestible for any neutral

Posted: 1 months ago

Originally posted by Jazzkapur



my way of expressing is simple. U don't agree with me that's why My simple statement makes u feel that I'm arguing. N this time also i started by agreeing with u that 'i also liked ekleen' becoz u said that u liked ekleen but my happiness about ekam is making u feel more angry becoz u r upset about Advait



@red - Like seriously??

You think your statements are simple then you are living in a false illusion.

@green - I think it's the other way round, you quoted my post to disagree with me because I said I was happy with Ekam not saving Nehmat.

It was clear that your ego of a Hitesh fan got hurt over there,

Which is why you went ahead showing off your happiness on how much Ekam's character is glorified.

Did I even ask you about it?

And what am I going to do with your happiness? 

Make a pickle out of it?

You express your emotions wherever you want but don't do it by quoting those people's post who don't emote the way you do.

Because then that does become an ARGUMENT!

Posted: 1 months ago
Originally posted by Jazzkapur


It's funny how some people wanted positive ekam to become negative or grey but same people just can't digest already grey Advait becoming more negative. Good person ko bad banana h but already bad person ko aur bad bante nai sakte. They r comparing angad-fateh character change to advait-ekam. According to them, bad Advait will make ekam look good. Ulta they wanted bad ekam to make Advait look good. They themselves wanted fateh-angad character change for advait-ekam but makers did opposite. They made already good ekam better n already bad Advait worse which is totally digestible for any neutral

I agree with you on this.

I personally wanted both Ekam and Advait to be positive.

There were others too who wanted both men positive like @Miss-Behave and @Tvfanatic.

I think the CVs do need one man to be completely negative to glorify the other.

Posted: 1 months ago
Originally posted by Jazzkapur


It's funny how some people wanted positive ekam to become negative or grey but same people just can't digest already grey Advait becoming more negative. Good person ko bad banana h but already bad person ko aur bad bante nai sakte. They r comparing angad-fateh character change to advait-ekam. According to them, bad Advait will make ekam look good. Ulta they wanted bad ekam to make Advait look good. They themselves wanted fateh-angad character change for advait-ekam but makers did opposite. They made already good ekam better n already bad Advait worse which is totally digestible for any neutral


People are unhappy with the blatant degradation of advait character whilst simultaneously making advait even more positive right after marriage. Ekam was already a goody-two-shoes ab they purposely making him mahaan even more in everything whilst making advait more negative so people have right to complain  when they can see that advait character is being degraded from a more interesting grey character to a aggressive negative character to glorify ekam. 


Many people enjoyed advait because he was neither goody-two-shoes like that nibba-nibbi jodi and neither was he psychotic and inhuman like jasmine and his father. 


Both men are capable of being good but writers not interested in showing positivity in both. 

Edited by Miss-Behave - 1 months ago
Posted: 1 months ago

Originally posted by Aleyamma47



@red - Like seriously??

You think your statements are simple then you are living in a false illusion.

@green - I think it's the other way round, you quoted my post to disagree with me because I said I was happy with Ekam not saving Nehmat.

It was clear that your ego of a Hitesh fan got hurt over there,

Which is why you went ahead showing off your happiness on how much Ekam's character is glorified.

Did I even ask you about it?

And what am I going to do with your happiness? 

Make a pickle out of it?

You express your emotions wherever you want but don't do it by quoting those people's post who don't emote the way you do.

Because then that does become an ARGUMENT!

of course my this statement was simple. What's wrong in 'nehmat didn't need to be saved by ekam' it's true. I mentioned about that misleading promo to explain my context in which that terrorist slapped nehmat but in real episode nothing like this happened. That's why i said nehmat didn't need ekam to save herself coz she was not even held captive by terrorists. My point was also that promo was misleading N it's crystal clear that ur ego of advait fan is badly hurt that's why u can't handle that makers r making hitesh fan happy that's why u were happy about ekam not saving nehmat. Be happy that ekam couldn't save nehmat. It's good. may be that will help nehmat to forget ekam U got saved from watching atleast 1 nehkam scene. Enjoy nehvait scenes. Today also u will get to watch a nehvait scene, not a nehkam scene. In this forum, many advait fans r expressing anger clearly on makers, about nehmat n nehkam in a much more aggressive way. But u find only my posts argumentative. Why? Becoz u agree with those aggressive advait fans but u don't agree with me. N it's opposite. Here, many forum members think that every1 feels the same way as them by saying 'who is asking for nehkam, kon h vo jinki itni feeki taste h, etc' whereas there r many people i see on YouTube who want nehkam but i never said anything bad about nehvait fans' taste but u only find me negative why? Coz u don't agree with me. Anyways. U enjoy nehvait scenes

Posted: 1 months ago

Originally posted by Miss-Behave



People are unhappy with the blatant degradation of advait character whilst simultaneously making advait even more positive right after marriage. Ekam was already a goody-two-shoes ab they purposely making him mahaan even more in everything whilst making advait more negative so people have right to complain  when they can see that advait character is being degraded from a more interesting grey character to a aggressive negative character to glorify ekam. 


Many people enjoyed advait because he was neither goody-two-shoes like that nibba-nibbi jodi and neither was he psychotic and inhuman like jasmine and his father. 


Both men are capable of being good but writers not interested in showing positivity in both. 

my point is that Advait's character degradation is not at all like Angad. N some people wanted ekam to become negative.


Udaariyaan 


Related Topics

doc-text Topics pencil Author stackexchange Replies eye Views clock Last Post Reply
Udariyaan | Episode Discussion Thread #90

pencil Namita-M   stackexchange 1206   eye 36556

Namita-M 1206 36556 1 months ago Jazzkapur
Udariyaan Social Media Updates Thread #2

pencil Leprechaun   stackexchange 368   eye 17143

Leprechaun 368 17143 a day ago AbjiniRockss
Udariyaan Chat Club #2

pencil Leprechaun   stackexchange 110   eye 3696

Leprechaun 110 3696 2 days ago Aleyamma47
Udariyaan | Episode Discussion Thread #89

pencil FieryLioness   stackexchange 1199   eye 37094

FieryLioness 1199 37094 1 months ago gibige
UDARIYAAN CC#1

pencil Sparklle801   stackexchange 1193   eye 33461

Sparklle801 1193 33461 1 months ago Leprechaun

Topic Info

32 Participants 1208 Replies 53025Views

Topic started by FieryLioness

Last replied by Minhasmansi92

loader
loader
up-open TOP