Please abide by the IF Rules & Regulations at all times.
No bashing of actors or discussing their personal lives. This EDT is only for Episode Discussion!
Permission given by the Channel Mod.-- Mnx12
It's funny how some people wanted positive ekam to become negative or grey but same people just can't digest already grey Advait becoming more negative. Good person ko bad banana h but already bad person ko aur bad bante nai sakte. They r comparing angad-fateh character change to advait-ekam. According to them, bad Advait will make ekam look good. Ulta they wanted bad ekam to make Advait look good. They themselves wanted fateh-angad character change for advait-ekam but makers did opposite. They made already good ekam better n already bad Advait worse which is totally digestible for any neutral
my way of expressing is simple. U don't agree with me that's why My simple statement makes u feel that I'm arguing. N this time also i started by agreeing with u that 'i also liked ekleen' becoz u said that u liked ekleen but my happiness about ekam is making u feel more angry becoz u r upset about Advait
@red - Like seriously??
You think your statements are simple then you are living in a false illusion.
@green - I think it's the other way round, you quoted my post to disagree with me because I said I was happy with Ekam not saving Nehmat.
It was clear that your ego of a Hitesh fan got hurt over there,
Which is why you went ahead showing off your happiness on how much Ekam's character is glorified.
Did I even ask you about it?
And what am I going to do with your happiness?
Make a pickle out of it?
You express your emotions wherever you want but don't do it by quoting those people's post who don't emote the way you do.
Because then that does become an ARGUMENT!
It's funny how some people wanted positive ekam to become negative or grey but same people just can't digest already grey Advait becoming more negative. Good person ko bad banana h but already bad person ko aur bad bante nai sakte. They r comparing angad-fateh character change to advait-ekam. According to them, bad Advait will make ekam look good. Ulta they wanted bad ekam to make Advait look good. They themselves wanted fateh-angad character change for advait-ekam but makers did opposite. They made already good ekam better n already bad Advait worse which is totally digestible for any neutral
I agree with you on this.
I personally wanted both Ekam and Advait to be positive.
There were others too who wanted both men positive like @Miss-Behave and @Tvfanatic.
I think the CVs do need one man to be completely negative to glorify the other.
It's funny how some people wanted positive ekam to become negative or grey but same people just can't digest already grey Advait becoming more negative. Good person ko bad banana h but already bad person ko aur bad bante nai sakte. They r comparing angad-fateh character change to advait-ekam. According to them, bad Advait will make ekam look good. Ulta they wanted bad ekam to make Advait look good. They themselves wanted fateh-angad character change for advait-ekam but makers did opposite. They made already good ekam better n already bad Advait worse which is totally digestible for any neutral
People are unhappy with the blatant degradation of advait character whilst simultaneously making advait even more positive right after marriage. Ekam was already a goody-two-shoes ab they purposely making him mahaan even more in everything whilst making advait more negative so people have right to complain when they can see that advait character is being degraded from a more interesting grey character to a aggressive negative character to glorify ekam.
Many people enjoyed advait because he was neither goody-two-shoes like that nibba-nibbi jodi and neither was he psychotic and inhuman like jasmine and his father.
Both men are capable of being good but writers not interested in showing positivity in both.
Edited by Miss-Behave - 1 months ago@red - Like seriously??
You think your statements are simple then you are living in a false illusion.
@green - I think it's the other way round, you quoted my post to disagree with me because I said I was happy with Ekam not saving Nehmat.
It was clear that your ego of a Hitesh fan got hurt over there,
Which is why you went ahead showing off your happiness on how much Ekam's character is glorified.
Did I even ask you about it?
And what am I going to do with your happiness?
Make a pickle out of it?
You express your emotions wherever you want but don't do it by quoting those people's post who don't emote the way you do.
Because then that does become an ARGUMENT!
People are unhappy with the blatant degradation of advait character whilst simultaneously making advait even more positive right after marriage. Ekam was already a goody-two-shoes ab they purposely making him mahaan even more in everything whilst making advait more negative so people have right to complain when they can see that advait character is being degraded from a more interesting grey character to a aggressive negative character to glorify ekam.
Many people enjoyed advait because he was neither goody-two-shoes like that nibba-nibbi jodi and neither was he psychotic and inhuman like jasmine and his father.
Both men are capable of being good but writers not interested in showing positivity in both.
| Topics | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post Reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Udariyaan | Episode Discussion Thread #90
Namita-M 1206 36556 |
Namita-M | 1206 | 36556 | 1 months ago Jazzkapur |
|
Udariyaan Social Media Updates Thread #2
Leprechaun 368 17143 |
Leprechaun | 368 | 17143 | a day ago AbjiniRockss |
|
Udariyaan Chat Club #2
Leprechaun 110 3696 |
Leprechaun | 110 | 3696 | 2 days ago Aleyamma47 |
|
Udariyaan | Episode Discussion Thread #89
FieryLioness 1199 37094 |
FieryLioness | 1199 | 37094 | 1 months ago gibige |
|
UDARIYAAN CC#1
Sparklle801 1193 33461 |
Sparklle801 | 1193 | 33461 | 1 months ago Leprechaun |
