Anupama jail mai group bana kar dusre criminals ko sudharegi aur uski saza kam ho jayegi seeing her good behaviour aisa dikha kar 1 episode mai mother india and ahmedabad ki local Tulsi jail se bahar hogi.
Waise hi Ek Saal ho gaya CVS are not focusing on anupama journey properly unke pass other character like kinjal Pakhi ke track dikhane ki fursat hai Even Naya idea bhi hote hai other character ko highlight karne ke liye be it kinjal malvika vanraj but anupama ki own journey jub ki yeh serial anupama ke baare mein hi hai to Magar phir anupama ke track dikhane ki fursat nahi hai aur uske liye koi idea nahi hai ?
Anupama ki own journey he toh chal rahi hai na!
Anupama set example by making maayka to her ex-sasural.
Anupama set example about how to live in ex sasural post divorce with ex-husband and his new wife.
Anupama set example with dham dhoom vali lower middle class dadi ki saddi with dadi’s kamaai.
Anupama set example of carrying 8-10 Matkas daily on head.
Kitne examples set kiye hai Anupama ne viewers ke liye
Setting examples to audiences itself is anupama’s own journey.
Anupama ki koi journey nahi dikhayi yeh bol kar tum anupama ke itne set kiye examples ki insult kar rahi ho surabhi 😭😭😭
CVS should check how their trp badly fall from 4.2 to 3.4 because of focusing on vanraj journey with help of malvika but still they go on showing vanraj the great hero of show and giving so much importance to this vanraj character
People thought after Anuj entry with help of anuj they will focus on anupama journey but no they made busy anupama Anuj in filmy romance and start showing vanraj business journey with malvika .Matlab vanraj ke aish they koi bhi woman vanraj ki zindagi mein aaye woh vanraj pe fida aur plus vanraj ko Kam samar itne paisa wala ban gaya
Matlab jis character vanraj ne cheating ki aur totrue kiya usi character Har mamle mein ash karwa Rahe Hai?
And more over that it has drastically fall because vanraj ki wish thi ki Kam samay mein woh Anuj ke Barabar business ban ke dikhayaga aur CVS ne us vanraj ki iccha bhi poori bhi kar diya ?
Edited by surabhi01 - 1 years agoThe statement is a bit misleading, Adultery is not a punishable criminal offense - read more about it here
A five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court unanimously ruled on 27 September 2018 to repeal Section 497, thus eliminating it as an offence in India.
While reading the judgment, Chief Justice Dipak Misra said, "it (adultery) cannot be a criminal offence," however it can be a ground for civil issues like divorce.[11]
Section 497 was unconstitutional as the very basis for criminalising adultery was the assumption that a woman is considered as property of the husband and cannot have relations outside of marriage. The same restrictions, however, did not apply in the case of the husband. Section 497 violates the right to privacy as well as the liberty of women by discriminating against married women and perpetuating gender stereotypes.
The statement is a bit misleading, Adultery is not a punishable criminal offense - read more about it here
A five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court unanimously ruled on 27 September 2018 to repeal Section 497, thus eliminating it as an offence in India.
While reading the judgment, Chief Justice Dipak Misra said, "it (adultery) cannot be a criminal offence," however it can be a ground for civil issues like divorce.[11]
Section 497 was unconstitutional as the very basis for criminalising adultery was the assumption that a woman is considered as property of the husband and cannot have relations outside of marriage. The same restrictions, however, did not apply in the case of the husband. Section 497 violates the right to privacy as well as the liberty of women by discriminating against married women and perpetuating gender stereotypes.
The statement is a bit misleading, Adultery is not a punishable criminal offense - read more about it here
A five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court unanimously ruled on 27 September 2018 to repeal Section 497, thus eliminating it as an offence in India.
While reading the judgment, Chief Justice Dipak Misra said, "it (adultery) cannot be a criminal offence," however it can be a ground for civil issues like divorce.[11]
Section 497 was unconstitutional as the very basis for criminalising adultery was the assumption that a woman is considered as property of the husband and cannot have relations outside of marriage. The same restrictions, however, did not apply in the case of the husband. Section 497 violates the right to privacy as well as the liberty of women by discriminating against married women and perpetuating gender stereotypes.
Plus how would implementation work 🤔 Not going to get support so hard to pass such a law 🤪
He can still go for cheating that other girl.