Originally posted by: Maroonporsche
Money is concrete factor which a person can look up
Being taken seriously sounds vague lol (Did you poll whole fans of world to get their opinions on Salman/Salim😆)
Ill stick w Salman
Well I did agree on the money part but then lots of people have money. The article wasn't asking who was richer.
Being taken seriously as an artist is not vague but yes its subjective. If you compare their expertise in their respective fields , it would take a lot of audacity to say Salman is better at acting than Salim was at Writing/acting/filmmaking. Say for example you end up with the responsibility of choosing a director for the Lalita Kala Academy. Would you choose Salim or Salman? That's what I meant by being taken seriously as an artist or in this case being a better artist. Not to forget Salim was plenty popular in a pre digital age during his Salim Javed duo days.
Kim Kardashian is awfully popular all over the world and is loaded with money but Naomi Campbell would always been taken more seriously as a model even though most people out of the ones you meet wouldn't know who she is.
Going by this very soon we will see Suhana Khan being voted as more successful than the nobody SRK. And then we will have the 13 somethings come and debate about how they came to know about SRK’s existence because of their idol Suhana and hence proved that she is more successful than her nobody daddy! 😆
Rishi Kapoor was definitely bigger than his son Ranbir absolutely no doubt about it. He was the most successful star among his brothers too.
comment:
p_commentcount