This content was originally posted by: shirasainiactually,in virat and pakki, Ajinkya and Sai case is entirely different.
True and I have mentioned in my post as well
1) virat told sai that he is committed towards someone whereas sai didn't tell him like that
True but she was ok with the deal . He never indulged in EMA after his marriage to Sai . Having resuidal feelings is not EMA but if he acted on them then it would be
2) Pakki still desperate for Virat where Ajinkya is jus a friend and does cross his limit
Virat doesn’t cross his limits so he shouldn’t be accused of it . She could blame Pakhi but why pull Virat as well . Sai believes Pakhi is his present and Virat believes Ajinkya can be Sai’s future .
3) Pakki always troubles sai but Ajinkya. doesn't do anything like that to virat
True but Pakhi troubling Sai is not equivalent Virat Pakhi are having EMA
4) Virat still didn't propose Sai and didn't clarify his relationship with pakki yet...
He has his reasons for not proposing Sai and if Sai is unsure about his relationship with Pakhi then doesn’t she move out instead of staying with him . Why doesn’t she think they ate having EMA when things are normal but only feels when they have a fight .
He must be gotten idea that how hurting it would be for Sai when pakki idiot always barge into their bedroom 😠
You are right despite residual feelings Virat never allowed Pakhi to be close to him
comment:
p_commentcount