Originally posted by: Rohil.ban12
I don’t know how can someone be happy with this decision… though this was a good gesture from Bapuji but apne maa ke ghar jakar bhai bhabhi ke saath rehna aur ek hi chat ke neeche apne sautan ke saath rehna is so much different… and koi partition nahi hai… in an article it’s mentioned bas baa kitchen divide kar denge Anupama aur Kavya ke beech main and sab Anupama ke taraf se khana khayenge… And Anupama ke Maayke main bhabhi toh shayad karaye kyunki uske Khud ki mom aur bhai aache dikhaye the but yahan Baa, Pakhi, toshu, dolly, vanraj and Kavya sab karvayenge hi karvayenge
Aur jis bapuji ne yeh decision liya hai khud voh bhi karvayenge
And makers koi partition nahi banane vale and they are not showing a metro city and moreover Anupama 100 children ko dance sikhate the and per childern 500 lete the and then school teacher…so approx 70-80k and itne main koi bhi thik apartment main rent pe reh sakta hai… kuch bhi makers dikha rahe hai abhi toh such shittt
And far away from reality…
Not to be offensive but if you are saying that there is no issue staying with the partition and in future if you are in same situation then will you stay with your sautan and all who didn’t respected you for 25 years 🤨🧐
I am not thinking anupama as only divorcee woman. I am seeing her as mother of grown up children to who will gonna stay with their father because of Anupama’s wish to not break family.
I want anupama to stay around her children. Divorce can happen with husband not with children.
I know I will never be at anupama’s place but if it’s like that, I will definitely add wall partition in the house and will choose to stay around my grown up children in place of living to my mother’s place , leaving my grown children behind with step mother who can make their life hell. Individual woman can easily move own anywhere but when you are mother , things are totally different.
In place of asking children to stay with father, she should allow her children to stay with her, they all can buy separate house together and live their peacefully without kavya’s nuisance but she never encouraged her children to stay with her. Can’t imagine this mother never encouraged her children to stay with her . She gave more weightage of staying with father and his new family🤢
Bacche kitne bhi kharab ho, no mother mother can leave grown up kids behind with evil step mother.
As you said , anupama should take that property but should stay at somewhere else. As a individual divorcee woman this is good solution but when you are mother , why would you like to left all the children with father and evil step mother?
Why they want to portray that if woman takes divorce with husband, she should take divorce with children too so she can lead solo life . What kind of message is this??? Mothers can lead solo life with children too or being around children too.
Bacche chote ho yah bade, Maa ki zarurat sabko hoti hai and Maa ko bhi baccho ki zarurat hamesha hoti hai.
Dunia mai koi Maa aisi nahi hogi jisko apne bacche ki zarurat yah sath nahi chahiye hoga . In a same way dunia mai koi bhi bada yah chota baccha aisa nahi hoga jisko maa ki zarurat nahi hogi.
Edited by sweet_tania - 2 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount