I think I judged the actress playing Patralekha too much on her acting. I feel most of us judged her for her poker face and lack of expressions in scenes that are supposed to be impactful. But honestly, I would rather take this
Than this
or this
Like, what on earth are these expressions? It's seems like her expressions depict either lack of acting, or over-acting. I mean, if there is something beyond over-acting, it is this.
That leads us to my question now, what is good/great acting? It is when you feel like the actor playing the part is not present, but the character itself is in front of you. Good acting goes beyond just dialogue delivery. It is taking the part and the dialogue and making the audiences feel something with them, be it love, angst, hatred, humor or anything.
^Look at this expression. Any viewer who sees this can understand what she's feeling - anger and disbelief.
^Or this, where one can understand that she's wary and she's challenging. The anger is still there, but it has been controlled given the situation and the place.
Whereas a bad actor, makes acting feel like acting. The one who is unable to express their feelings through their eyes or even their body language. They are either blank, deadpan on screen or they are too over the top and make us cringe. Another mark of an average/bad actor is the usage of their facial features - especially the eyebrows and the forehead. When an actor constantly uses their eyebrows and not their eyes to express, the expression ends up looking muddled. Eyebrows definitely play an important role while depicting a particular expression, but the over usage of it only makes it worse.
Also, a good actor will let themselves feel whatever they're going to express, whereas a bad actor will just have a vague understanding of what the expression should look like and will scrunch up their face in various ways to somehow get an expression, which results in something like this
No matter how terrible a character is, if the acting makes up for it, the show is still enjoyable. If the actor/actress who plays the negative character very well, we might enjoy the face-off between the protagonist and the antagonist a bit better, we can empathise with the character if needed, and if there is a redemption arc, it would make us even want to root for the character. But if the acting is terrible, then the entire beauty of the episode is spoilt, no matter how many heartwarming moments between other characters are there. This kind of acting makes you cringe, and it most definitely makes you want to skip the scene or even the entire episode, no matter how good the other actors are.
In this post, I've compared Ayesha and Aishwarya because both of them are relatively new to the field, and for both of them, this is a big break. I'm not claiming that Ayesha is a top-notch actress who aces every scene. She does have her bad moments. Especially during her confrontation and anger scenes, she has this habit of pursing her lips a lot and huffing unnecessarily. She also enunciates words where it is not necessary. But I do admire how she went from an inexperienced, average actor to an actor who can hold her ground against versatiles like Neil and Kishori.
And yeah, though I do enjoy the dialogues delivered by Sai or anyone who puts Pakhi in their place, I definitely do not enjoy the scene because Aishwarya's cringe-worthy acting makes it hard for me to focus on that scene.
I didn't make this post to bash anyone or praise anyone. I just wanted to write about what I thought was good acting and bad acting. I also wanted to know your opinions on what makes a good actor and what makes an actor bad. Your answers would definitely be very helpful as I'm writing a research paper on the same topic - What makes a good actor? So, please put forth your honest viewsđ
Love,
Niyađ¤
comment:
p_commentcount