Originally posted by: GrumpyTheCat
This? 😂
I am not good at explaining but will try.
Click on the image . Copy Image.
There is an icon here which looks like a picture. Click on it .
Paste image source into the bar that we previously copied ( first delete whatever there is) and done.
If someone has easier way to do it then I would appreciate the help. Also, if someone can explain better 😂
Oops, missed your post. 😳
🤣Originally posted by: taporiYou gotta click on the image icon in the tool bar of the message, and paste the URL of the gif there. And then cross your fingers, make a little prayer and hope the gif loads up just fine.
It gets on my nerves because I use my mobile browser 99% of times.
True. The site is not mobile friendly 😕
There should be an investigation on top PR agency who said SSR had no money to pay bills.
I try cropping my quotes now, because they look SO long, I don't feel like reading many. On the laptop they look teeny tiny though.
First of all witnesses, suspects and plaintiffs are not suppose to say anything about jurisdiction. That is purely between the lawyers and judges. You are there to give your bit of the story. Not to speak on the legality of it.
Originally posted by: KewlDude@ bold : sorry to disappoint you.
Now their problem is, although Sushant and Ankita bought 2 separate flats, but it was merged to make one. Now why is Ankita still living in the apartment when it was co - owned by Sushant, who was her ex.
Now beat that.
You do realize that na that it still is legally Sushant's property and he was paying EMI for it?? It belonged to him . It's a separate thing that he was too kind , generous or felt guilty to not have the possession back but still pay for it.
Interesting that she says that SSR's suicide has been "blown out of proportion." As compared to what, exactly? Can any human being's death be "blown out of proportion?" What a weird, callous thing to say.
Originally posted by: grumpydwarf
First of all witnesses, suspects and plaintiffs are not suppose to say anything about jurisdiction. That is purely between the lawyers and judges. You are there to give your bit of the story. Not to speak on the legality of it.
| topics | author | replies | views | reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| priya185 | 4 | 222 | ||
| oyebollywood | 2 | 390 | ||
| priya185 | 2 | 252 | ||
| mintyblue | 14 | 926 | ||
| oyebollywood | 21 | 907 |
comment:
p_commentcount