Originally posted by: CoolcucumberWhat about cultural background and beliefs which you have conveniently excluded now ? are they exclusive to one's religious background?
You are being selectively quoting and trying to digress.. It shows you're clutching at the straws to hide the communal mindset with which you made original argument which was that khans are targeted due to their cultural background and beliefs only. You clearly were meaning to say religion but didn't go all out knowing it would backfire so now beating around the bushes..
You can keep crying with your whataboutery regarding religion but I know my beliefs inside out. If I only believed in religion as a basis of discrimination, why would I be defending Deepika or Ranveer for that matter? I can see you want to indulge in name calling such as 'çommunal' etc. but you still have not responded to a single point that I brought up in this thread, rather you are quoting some phantom arguments about the Khans, that I didnt even make IN THIS CONTEXT.
The fact is, in this case, there is selective outrage based on a person's political beliefs (if that includes a person's religion/background then that will make them even softer targets but it's not the primary thing- not toeing the line politically is) which is the only reason DP is being singled out without any proof, in this defamatory manner.
You can call it by any other name. I'm not interested in indulging your need for rehashed and cliched talking points- "tukde tukde" "libtard" "communal card"etc which are about to come up in 3-2-1.
I'm not going to respond after this so you can enjoy having the last word, because frankly people who dont know how to engage and respond to a differing perspective, BORE me. So have at it. Bye!
Edited by Sashay01 - 3 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount