Kangana wasn’t an A-lister before Fashion and Priyanka, an outsider herself, had done way more movies and many accolades. Kangana clearly doesn’t care about insider or outsider, it’s just about benefiting herself.
Kangana wasn’t an A-lister before Fashion and Priyanka, an outsider herself, had done way more movies and many accolades. Kangana clearly doesn’t care about insider or outsider, it’s just about benefiting herself.
I dislike Shobha De to the core but she shares an incident about KR and sheds light on how the industry works to Vidya Balan
This content was originally posted by: SoreinI don’t watch their movies and no, I won’t deal with it. I will keep on spreading awareness for a more equal and meritocratic society.
You can keep on writing on the internet all you want but it won't change how someone runs their business. Unless they see a loss in income, it makes no difference to them.
The boycotts are going splendidly btw. Today Drive was trending on Netflix in India. Yeah, Dharma is losing lots of money. 🤔
Cry me a river
I didn't get the cover I want
Must be the elites against me
Furthermore, Vogue India launched in 2007 and Fashion came out in 2008. Why would they put Kangana on the cover (coming off of Shakalaka Boom Boom before Fashion) when other big stars haven’t been on it yet?
Even if she was supposedly "sidelined" by Voque, how is it any different than what she did to her costars in Manikarnika???
I am not gonna buy any crap that comes from her mouth.
Kudos to her for making this whole fiasco about her in the end.
She was a B-listers at that time. This is Kinda rich from someone who looked down Character artists as Chhote mote actors. Ab ayi equality ki devi banne.
This content was originally posted by: SoreinI cannot stand Kangana and find her to be vile, hypocritical and highly manipulative. BUT what you said is wrong on so many levels and the reason why our society is so f*** up. No, kids of stars or any high achieving parents don’t have to be at the same level just because they were born privileged. If that’s the case then what message are we sending to kids of unprivileged parents? That hard work and talent doesn’t pay off and they must deal with their unprivileged status and not aim higher? There have been examples (in the West mainly) of wealthy parents refusing to leave their inheritance to their children or giving them easy access to their network. If you want to be an actor you need to go for auditions like everybody else and directors need to cast the most deserving. We don’t have to just deal with it!
Well, fortunately this isn't the West. Even in the West these desi industry kids enjoy their privileges. Ranbir Kapoor despite getting poor SAT score got an admission to a well reputed American university. How? His father had requested the producer/director Ismail Merchant, and Ismail Merchant (Co-owner of Merchant Ivory Productions) negotiated with the faculty... What did he tell the faculty? He said the boy is the grandson of Raj Kapoor, the greatest film maker of India, how could they refuse to give him admission. That was enough, they took him.
That's how it works, undeserving dimwits who can't get a decent SAT score come back to India with degrees from fancy to elite schools and ride on high horses.
Deal with it.
This content was originally posted by: diasingh2Even if she was supposedly "sidelined" by Voque, wow is it any different than what she did to her costars in Manikarnika???
I am not gonna buy her crap that comes from her mouth.
Kudos to her for making this whole fiasco about her in the end.
She called these Chhote mote actors to character actors.
double post
comment:
p_commentcount