Can someone help me understand this
As per Ramayan Hanuman ji and his species weren't humans but Vanars (not sure what that meant some people have now started saying that they were Neanderthal) yet Hanuman ji reciting Vedas and speaking in Vedic Sanskrit didn't cause any to the kingdom (he spoke that way when he first encountered Ram n Lakshman) but when Shambhuk recited Vedas it resulted in the premature death of a Brahmin kid.
So do we relate it? Were the Shudras even below Vanars or non humans?
Can someone help me understand this
As per Ramayan Hanuman ji and his species weren't humans but Vanars (not sure what that meant some people have now started saying that they were Neanderthal) yet Hanuman ji reciting Vedas and speaking in Vedic Sanskrit didn't cause any to the kingdom (he spoke that way when he first encountered Ram n Lakshman) but when Shambhuk recited Vedas it resulted in the premature death of a Brahmin kid.
So do we relate it? Were the Shudras even below Vanars or non humans?
^^^ Agreed to the above point, I saw that thread and the posts made in it are true to the core, but if we say that Uttar Ramayana is an interpolation then the start of Ramayana where Luv Kush are being told the story of Ram Sita becomes confusing because if Ram n Seeta are together ruling over Ayodhya why are their kids in Valmiki Ashram! Shouldn't they be taught by Vashishth muni as their ancestors?
But still the behaviour of Ramji seems different from the earlier parts
^^^ Agreed to the above point, I saw that thread and the posts made in it are true to the core, but if we say that Uttar Ramayana is an interpolation then the start of Ramayana where Luv Kush are being told the story of Ram Sita becomes confusing because if Ram n Seeta are together ruling over Ayodhya why are their kids in Valmiki Ashram! Shouldn't they be taught by Vashishth muni as their ancestors?
But still the behaviour of Ramji seems different from the earlier parts