Originally posted by: surbhi1995Guys I was just thinking about anu' s decision to become a thornbird is valid as compared to kzk standard.Reason being they showed how pre agredd to become thornbird for her family to save her HOUSE only.It was justified by cvs.
Here anu decision was to save pre from capital punishment and also from komo threat is way too justified right.
not justified now.. Same way prerna was not justified when she married bajaj to save anurag. She was anurags wife and carrying his child and she took decision on his unborn tooo
Same now prerna was his wife & mother of his child he has taken decision on sneha without prernas consent.. Its like sending ur wife and child with other man without consent of wife.
Most illogical that these 2 decide without others consent and end up doing sin or crime.
What prerna did was crime and what anurag has done is also crime..
If prerna's crime can be given name of sacrifice than anurag's crime also falls under category of sacrifice only...
comment:
p_commentcount