Originally posted by: divyadaya13
the above would have happened if it was ekta maiyyas show π. But thank god it is not
Originally posted by: divyadaya13
the above would have happened if it was ekta maiyyas show π. But thank god it is not
Originally posted by: divyadaya13
the above would have happened if it was ekta maiyyas show π. But thank god it is not
Yup its correct over dramatic prediction which will not happen in PB, but surely in court they want to prove babes characterless also try to snatch Minni from babes
agar aisa koshish bhi kiya toh khuranaas ke saath saath ashok ke chapad ganju vakil aur judge ki bhi shaamat aa jayegiπ. Hamari minnie jhansi ki rani se kam thodi na hai. π
Yup its correct over dramatic prediction which will not happen in PB, but surely in court they want to prove babes characterless also try to snatch Minni from babes
wearing a locket of hanumanji dosent mean you have to be a brahmachaari. And hunuman is a widower and not brahmachaari. Even though its not necessary to always have a man in your life, but babes deserve someone who will love and respect her a lot as a woman and she has never experienced this kind of love so she deserves it. And there cant be any person better than hanuman singh. He is a true man. I dont want any other new character.Originally posted by: allizzwell
Off epi topic... π³...
I still get a brahmachari or devoted kind of vibes from HS...his name, his locket of bajrang bali all shows he will b devoted in taking care of 2 ladiez and giving support...but I don't c a love angle...possibly another male lead and HS might b instrumental in even uniting them.Is there any confirmation that there is no other male lead?Anyways I am happy with no love angle. Not necessary every bond b given a name. There r many selfless bond in the world which survives on the emotion of humanity. Will b happy if the show maintains that.π
Originally posted by: divyadaya13
agar aisa koshish bhi kiya toh khuranaas ke saath saath ashok ke chapad ganju vakil aur judge ki bhi shaamat aa jayegi π. Hamari minnie jhansi ki rani se kam thodi na hai. π
Originally posted by: divyadaya13
wearing a locket of hanumanji dosent mean you have to be a brahmachaari. And hunuman is a widower and not brahmachaari. Even though its not necessary to always have a man in your life, but babes deserve someone who will love and respect her a lot as a woman and she has never experienced this kind of love so she deserves it. And there cant be any person better than hanuman singh. He is a true man. I dont want any other new character.
Originally posted by: allizzwell
Off epi topic...π³...
I still get a brahmachari or devoted kind of vibes from HS...his name, his locket of bajrang bali all shows he will b devoted in taking care of 2 ladiez and giving support...but I don't c a love angle...possibly another male lead and HS might b instrumental in even uniting them.Is there any confirmation that there is no other male lead?Anyways I am happy with no love angle. Not necessary every bond b given a name. There r many selfless bond in the world which survives on the emotion of humanity. Will b happy if the show maintains that.π
comment:
p_commentcount