2.0 Movie Review - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

134

Views

16.1k

Users

36

Likes

86

Frequent Posters

Breath-Mark thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 5 years ago
#41


Raja Sen
Hindustan Times

http://www.hindustantimes.com/bollywood/2-0-robot-enthiran-review-rating-rajinikath-akshay-kumar-movie/story-iZCIPVlsKfKlfuR1Sl4bcN.html

2.0
Director - Shankar
Cast - Rajinikanth, Akshay Kumar, Amy Jackson
Rating - 3.5/5

Chennai is under attack. Every cellphone in the city from those used by fisherwomen to the one being used to take a funeral-selfie has flown from hands and vanished into the sky, leaving scientists befuddled. I found one floated theory particularly interesting: what if this is a rival cellular phone company trying to establish itself? Considering the way a certain service provider has busted the kneecaps of the competition with savagely predatory pricing, I wondered if this film's big bad was indeed a stand-in for one of India's megacorps: Could 2.0 give us Rajini vs Ambani?

No dice. Director Shankar has unfettered visual imagination and unconventional thinking, but despite well-meaning ideas at the core of his stories, his cinema only flirts with relevance instead of committing to it. The 2010 film Enthiran, also known as Robot, was essentially a Frankenstein film set in a world of artificial-intelligence, but what Shankar truly cracked was a way forward for his mythically outsized leading man: Rajinikanth played bearded and mild-mannered scientist Vasigaran, while all the punches and punchlines were saved for Chitti the Robot, his clean-shaven and highly superhuman alter-ego.

Watch the 2.0 trailer here

In this sequel 2.0, the battle is potentially fascinating: This film pits Rajinikanth versus the phones that give him the power he holds, via memes and ringtones and hashtags. Except the villain we get is a bit of a birdbrain: an ornithologist who, angered by the injustice we do to birds with the radiation from our cellular phone towers, uses thousands of disembodied cellphones to create an... angry bird.

"Nice DP, says Chitti when he comes face to face with the villain, unsubtly named Pakshiraja and played by Akshay Kumar. It is the right kind of response, for Kumar, despite his seemingly insurmountable power, never seems like a true threat once the Rajinikanths arrive on the scene. As if Dr Vasigaran and Chitti weren't enough, the scientist now has a fembot sidekick, NILA (which stands for Nice Intelligent Lovely Assistant) and Kumar, despite growing in size, can't quite measure up.

Rajinikanth returns as Chitti in 2.0, a sequel to Enthiran.

Nothing, of course, measures up to the visuals. Shankar is all about the spectacle and India's first film shot entirely in 3D doesn't disappoint. There is too much eagerness to give everything in the foreground the 3D treatment far too many objects are thrown at us but that enthusiasm is natural, like the first time someone discovers portrait mode on the iPhone. Enthiran had fabulous visuals of interlocked Rajinikanths, however, and it isn't easy to top that. This film does a lot, visually, and the idea of wriggling phones moving in the same direction is suitably creepy. The render isn't perfect and the opacity occasionally goes in and out, but the visual works. It's quite impressive.

Akshay Kumar plays Dr Richard in 2.0.

The film is rather linear, with an easy-to-identify and easy-to-extinguish problem, but coasts nicely on Rajini's charm. The superstar is in vintage screen-dominating form, both as the efficient Vasigaran as well as Chitti, who later becomes a red-streaked version of himself, an obnoxious sounding Oompa Loompa. Considering that Kumar too was a gentle, white-bearded conspiracy theorist who turned into a squawking vulture-type, this may be the film's way of telling us to beware of upgrades.

Rajini is ably supported by NILA, a Hot Siri played suitably stoically by Amy Jackson, who has raised herself on a diet of television, cinema, food and gossip in order to become more human. As a result, she's an enthusiastically passive aggressive robot who makes puns as she waits for robot love. It's a quirky part, and Jackson has fun with it.

Akshay Kumar's character is a bird lover.

Shankar is constantly dumbing it down: even when the mysterious villain is first hit by a "neutralization ray, an on-screen meter helpfully informs us how much longer he needs to be attacked. This is a family film' in the most obvious way. Yet Shankar also regularly gives us clever asides, both visual and verbal: a window-washer startled by the giant bird-monster, or queuing up to buy cellphones described as a pilgrimage.

This balance deserts the film in its final stretch, where the climax goes on and on and, at one point you will never be able to un-see, Rajini enters Kumar. Too many things meld together into bigger, more unweildy things, and Shankar's perpetual game of Lego even turns Chitti magnetic, covering him in all sorts of random metallic garbage like a Subodh Gupta installation. Also, the hero threatens the villains by holding pigeons ransom and threatening to snap their necks. Go figure.

Actually, don't. Despite that tedious climax, 2.0 is a blast. It could have been a smarter film, but it is a mostly fun Rajinikanth ride, with solid 3D and great Atmos sound so good is the mastering that at one point when Kumar sets many a phone ringing, I hissed at the person next to me in the theatre. Shankar sticks admirably to the plot and never slows down, with no time for melodrama or song sequences, despite a protracted Akshay Kumar flashback. Kumar has fun snarling and cawing, but a Rajini film is only about one man.

Now if only he could stop our calls from dropping.


Edited by Breath-Mark - 5 years ago
adventurousman thumbnail
Anniversary 10 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago
#42
It's not releasing here in the Netherlands but happy phir bhaag jaayegi was 😡 😆
1103978 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#43
It would be good if the movie works so Indian movies can work towards better Vfx .. just not sure how they'll recover the budget?! .. anyone know how much it needs to make to be a success?..
Ur-Miserable thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago
#44
this guy is one of my reference guy in YOUTUBE, and he has given a quite positive feedback.

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CRkbZ1O6VM[/YOUTUBE]
PD_forums thumbnail
Anniversary 14 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 5 years ago
#45
First day box office numbers??? Any news??
tina59 thumbnail
Anniversary 19 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago
#46
Going on Friday
Shows getting sold out quickly

It's celebration time, Shankar movies are made for big screen watching

First movie to be shot in 3d camera and also in 4k
Mira25 thumbnail
Anniversary 6 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#47
Review : Anupama Chopra



Director: S. Shankar

Cast: Rajinikanth, Akshay Kumar, Amy Jackson, Sudhanshu Pandey

Is there such a thing as an over-fertile imagination? What is that tipping point when dazzling becomes exhausting? And how many versions of Superstar Rajinikanth can one film juggle successfully?

I struggled with these questions when I stepped out of 2.0 the sequel to the blockbuster Enthiran or Robot, released in 2010. Shankar has created a unique spectacle that is at once, a cautionary tale against our over-dependence on cell phones, an eco-fable about how critical birds are for human survival and a treatise arguing for the balanced use of technology. It's also a testament to the brilliance of Shankar himself who is determined to give us the ride of a lifetime and to the staggering charisma of Rajinikanth who appears as Dr. Vaseegaran and several versions of the robot Chitti. There's also Akshay Kumar as the baddie Pakshi Rajan he's effectively menacing and the look, especially the avian eyebrows are deadly. Could this birdman be cinema's first ornithologist villain?


2.0 is a sensory overload. The film has over 2000 special effect shots. It's the first time that an Indian film has been shot in 3D. And for the first hour at least, the visuals are hypnotic. The idea of cell phones turning on humans is genius. Shankar bung in throwaway lines that firmly establish our addiction to our devices one woman begging the cops to help her retrieve her missing phone says she had hooked it to her mangalsutra and lost that too. Another man inquires i Phone ke liye alag section hai? It's funny and alarming because we all know this is exactly the scenario that would play out if we had to live without our phones for a day.

Also Read: Every Shankar Film, Ranked

We witness death by cell phone literally. Shankar, who has also written the screenplay, builds up to the introduction of Pakshi Rajan, his backstory and his connection with birds. Through the first half, we are only seeing thousands of phones flying together to make a bird-like creature. The suspense is carefully constructed. But what Robot had and what 2.0 lacks is a strong emotional quotient. The first film tackled complex ideas of human emotions and hubris and what happens when the creation turns on the creator. 2.0 is visually overpowering the VFX are mostly first-rate but the screenplay doesn't offer the seamless mix of romance, drama and comedy. Some of the writing is lazy. Though Amy Jackson's casting as the humanoid robot Nila will make you smile. She's suitably expression-free. Of course, women have little to do here in once scene, Dr. Vasi refers to Nila as a laptop.

The vigilante theme, a constant in Shankar movies, is repeated one more time. Post-interval, we go into a flashback within a flashback to discover why Pakshi Rajan is who he is. Lots of jargon is tossed in and at one point, there is a discussion on positive signals versus negative Shakti and microphoton minus death ka aura or something like that. My head started to hurt.

Shankar's cinema uniquely combines scale with social message. Just in case you've missed the point of this film, at the end, Dr. Vaseegaran spells it out again. Like everything else in 2.0, it's a tiring overdose.

But you need to see the film just to see what ambition and imagination and the confluence of talented artists among others, VFX supervisor Srinivas Mohan, cinematographer Nirav Shah, sound designer Resul Pookutty and editor Anthony can create. And of course, you need to see it to appreciate the singular sensation that Rajinikanth continues to be. At one point Chitti declares bhag jana mere software mein nahin hai. That's my new motto.

Rating:
Edited by Mira25 - 5 years ago
heartbleed thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail Engager 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#48
KRKBOXOFFICE
@KRKBoxOffice
6h
Half an hour gone and what a great Chutiyapa film #2point0 till here. Shankar has fooled a person to waste 600Cr! Unbelievable!




KRK
@kamaalrkhan
5h
Every scene of #2.0 is full of comedy. You will be forced to say, Bas Shankar sir pls Maaf Kardo.


KRK
@kamaalrkhan
5h
It's interval and entry of #AkshayKumar and #2.0 is all time biggest chutiyapa till here. Director Shankar sir has proved that nobody will be able to make bigger chutiyapa than him ever in the future also.



KRK
KRK
@kamaalrkhan
5h
My GOD! According to director Shankar India has invented cell phone technology and rest of the world wants to snatch that technology from us. Salute to ur knowledge sir


KRK
@kamaalrkhan
4h
I am really not able to Jhelo this crap #2point0 anymore but still I will watch it till the end to give honest review.


KRK
@kamaalrkhan
4h
Film #2point0 is the most Waahiyat, Ghatiya and crap film I have ever watched in my entire life. It's totally waste of money, time and energy. So 0* from me for wasting 600Cr on this crap. More details in the video review.


KRK
@kamaalrkhan
3h
Many people are asking me to compare #TOH n #2point0! So #ThugsOfHindosthan is #Sholay compare to this crap #2Point0



KRKBOXOFFICE
@KRKBoxOffice
4h
I am shocked and tired physically and mentally after watching most crap film ever #2Point0! I am just trying to understand that how did producers agree to waste 600Cr on this film? Shankar Ne producers Ko Kaya Sunaya Hoga?
Edited by heartbleed - 5 years ago
Ur-Miserable thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago
#49

Originally posted by: heartbleed


KRK
KRK
@kamaalrkhan
</div>
5h
Every scene of #2.0 is full of comedy. You will be forced to say, Bas Shankar sir pls Maaf Kardo.


KRK
@kamaalrkhan
5h
It's interval and entry of #AkshayKumar and #2.0 is all time biggest chutiyapa till here. Director Shankar sir has proved that nobody will be able to make bigger chutiyapa than him ever in the future also.



KRK
KRK
@kamaalrkhan
5h
My GOD! According to director Shankar India has invented cell phone technology and rest of the world wants to snatch that technology from us. Salute to ur knowledge sir


KRK
@kamaalrkhan
4h
I am really not able to Jhelo this crap #2point0 anymore but still I will watch it till the end to give honest review.


KRK
@kamaalrkhan
4h
Film #2point0 is the most Waahiyat, Ghatiya and crap film I have ever watched in my entire life. It's totally waste of money, time and energy. <font color="#ff0000">So 0* from me for wasting 600Cr on this crap.</font> More details in the video review.



KRK
KRK
@kamaalrkhan
3h
Many people are asking me to compare #TOH n #2point0! So #ThugsOfHindosthan is #Sholay compare to this crap #2Point0



KRKBOXOFFICE
KRKBOXOFFICE
@KRKBoxOffice
<div>4h
I am shocked and tired physically and mentally after watching most crap film ever #2Point0! I am just trying to understand that how did producers agree to waste 600Cr on this film? Shankar Ne producers Ko Kaya Sunaya Hoga?



I think this fathafaka doesn't deserve any attention 😆
heartbleed thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail Engager 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#50
0 star by krk? is it so bad? 😲
Top