Abhijit Ji !!! Its difficult to beleive a person having 3 frogs signature!!!! Where are the frogs and where are the insects!!!!
Back to the discussion!!! Don't we feel like revolting or help the people who are revolting when our family members,friends and fellow citizens die unnecessarily!!!!! A common person may not have the calibre or capability to go and directly fight with enemy but when everything is lost , an unknown courage,strength awakens and at this state people lose their control and may support extremists also.At this point the extremists take advantage of their mental state and they do much much more terrorist activities,this is what happening in Kashmir and Iraq.
However ,in Iraq thousands of common people died and why should'nt we hold responsible BUSH for it,if a war takes place,for the success or failure of the war only the Chief is responsible.
Regards,
Mythili
Sahi hai. Ekdum sixer. 👏Bush proved to be a bad leader, both at home and abroad.
Edited by Pradarshak - 17 years agoWith the benefit of hindsight it is easy to harp on Bush and Iraq war but when Baghdad fell and Hussein sons got killed Bush had the highest approval ratinug. Since then the rise in insurgencies has threatened the stability in the region and in turn been the cause of dissatisfaction at home. War is never the first option but when the enemy causes harm in your home , it is inevitable.
I am not approving Bush or disapproving anyone else but my allegiance will be with the one who tried to fight rather then the one who chose to do nothing and perhaps could have avoided 9/11...
Yeah very logical, whatever you say. There are many nations in the world who have anti-American views. Does that mean you go and bombard each of them? N. Korea, Syria, Iran, Cuba and a lot many. Not going after the real enemy responsible for 9/11, but after someone with a bad blood from the past. Must say a very efficient leader. That points towards a motive to attack Iraq.
Clinton might have failed to identify the sworn enemy who would be threatful to the country in near future, what did Bush administration do? There was a report about the terror plot 2-3 months before 9/11, they had report about terrorist gathering in Malayasia for a bigger event. At least hope that Clinton would have taken a different strategy to fight terrorism post 9/11.
Edited by Pradarshak - 17 years agobingo. if we look at mckinsey-type management consultants, they start with a hypothesis and generate "facts" to prove/ disprove it. in this case, these guys went one beyond the consulting folks. it was more like starting with a hypothesis and manufacturing facts on a need-to-prove basis. having a big govt bureaucracy to selectively unearth and creatively present those facts then also helped.