How unfair.
Going through few pages over discussion on Mahabharata.
They are saying karna defeated bhima .
And their argument was that an unarmed warrior can't give mercy to armed warrior it clearly indicate who won that is karna.it happened 14day.
Seriously they read only last part I guess.
That day bhima and karna almost fought for half day.
Bhima fought all day in his single chariot.he didn't loose any of his horses tied to chariot nor his charioeer.
Karna in whole fled 17 times lost his chariot multiple times so his weapons get refilled every time with new chariot coming.
Then almost 20 of kauravas were killed right before his eyes.who were sent by duryodhana in different intervals to save karna from bhima.
Then 7among them were killed while fighting simultaneously with karna.like simultaneously he was outnumbered by 8 to 1.
Adding bhima fought with bow and arrow .
They were always some one coming to save karna while bhima fought alo.e and alone.
Karna was supposed to be good in bow and arrow and he couldn't subdue bhima who was alone fighting with his bow and arrow for almost half a day and couldn't save kauravas from being killed by bhima and adding instead fled away from fight 17times.
And bhima did all this with a single chariot and got his arrows exhausted while karna repeatedly loosing his chariot got fresh supply of weapons.
And they argue it is bhima who lost.
Seriously technically karna didn't disarm bhima to win and one can't kill unarmed person according to rules without disarming him.
Then also one can't fight unarmed person in duel so technically karna should also face bhima unarmed .
Bhima asked for bare arm fight and karna very well know no one can defeat bhima in bare arm fight.
And yet they say bhima lost .fools or people of half knowledge.
Bhima is true allrounder who could use all weapons
comment:
p_commentcount