@ barbie and Maverick_me
Bible is just another scripture.Like every other religious text,a part it could be true and a part of it -a mere exaggeration of a simple event.The only difference is that, Bible being a comparatively recent work ,one could come up with more evidences to cite.Since I haven't read bible yet and not being familiar about the events mentioned in it ,I'd reserve commenting on what all could be a fact or a belief for later.
I did not say everything mentioned in scriptures are false or did not existed.At the same time,I don't consider everything true,either.For example,some places described in Mahabharata like Mathura,Vrindhavan,Dwaraka etc still exists.Same goes for many places mentioned in Ramayana.That may be considered as an evidence that scriptures are not a mere work of fiction.At the same time,no convincing evidence(like a part of the object or an authentic spoken or written account from the time)of things like Vimanas and varies types of Astras have never been found. Of course any one can easily describe how a Pushpak Vimana might have looked like or what a Vajrayudha is made of.For that one only need to refer the scriptures itself as they're explained very well there.Not any evidence is needed.
The supernatural weapons I mentioned earlier are various type of Astras .Not all astras though,I was talking specifically of those which produce a supernatural effect like a Brahmastra.
You could find many people who take scriptures for their literal meaning ,who believe every event mentioned is true.You could also find many people who consider them as just stories.I personally know a few Hindu atheists who thinks the same.Still they consider texts like Gita in high regard for the philosophy it imparts.Then there are people like me who are between these two extremes.As long as these three group of people exists,it will stay as a matter of belief to one's convenience than a fact.
P.S Thanks for the welcome.😆
Edited by QuietlyLoud - 9 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount