Urvashi's talk on Revolutionaries was Fair Unfair?

  •  
  • Page of 1 Go
  •  
Poll Question :

Urvashi's talk about Revolutionaries was Fair or Unfair?

Poll Choice
Fair..!
Unfair..!
Login To Vote
Posted: 11 years ago
TV-Star Urvashi's talk about Revolutionaries that.. "they are dependent on media.." was fair or unfair?



Edited by mahiya - 11 years ago
Posted: 11 years ago
Highly unfair. Look, revolutions happen because they are ought to happen. It has been a part and parcel of any country or civilization since dawn. They didn't have media in early days but still revolutions have taken place and changed the face of the world and course of actions. If we talk about the recent time, media has been acting as a catalyst and sure does influences the social web zone but as far as revolutions are concerned, they are not dependent on media and neither are revolutionaries. Period!
Posted: 11 years ago
ofcourse its dependent on media!


Without the cameras, do u think we would know who Anna Hazare, Kejriwal or Aseem were? 

and now i feel Aseem's cartoon and mainly the arrest and hoopla around was politically motivated.
he is so calm and collected and yes, he is a artist, and its true, the cartoon made sense as well. the national emblem surrounded with monsters or whatever it was, it may be insulting but it is true. which state was it where he was arrested??
Posted: 11 years ago
They are depandant on media but not the glamour media which TV bahus are a part of.
Posted: 11 years ago
He was arrested in Maharashtra. Anyway, putting up my point, the likes of Hazare and Kejriwal are not just media dependent. Lets be honest and accept the fact that Indian media is paid. They will go to any extent to supress the Vadra's of Indian politics and obscure the Kejriwals of India. And for the second fact, revolutionaries are not made by media. Never. I'm not opposed to the thought that media is a guiding force these days but revolutionaries being dependent on it, is out of bound here. Revolutionaries come to the fore front, take charge, and people start following. Now how people start following is another interesting thing. It's like spread of word by mouth, Social Networking(as happened in August Kranti), and our own need of arising to the oppression. 
Posted: 11 years ago
Originally posted by nirvanlove


ofcourse its dependent on media!


Without the cameras, do u think we would know who Anna Hazare, Kejriwal or Aseem were? 



Just to give you two examples,--------- recently one revolution happened in Libya where Dictator Gaddafi, after decades of iron fist rule, was overthrown, hunted down and lynched to death by mobs. And in Egypt too, after years of rule, Sadat was over thrown and Government changed.

Both these countries had 100% Government control media only...not even a whiff of opposition allowed on air ever.😲

Great Sant Sidhu said this morning,"Doodh ko Bhatti pe rakho, toh uska ubalna Nischit hai---------------------Aakrosh jab hudd se badh jaaye toh, Sarkaron ka Girna nishchit hai Guru"...Thoko taali-khataak!👏

Edited by cruiser51 - 11 years ago
Posted: 11 years ago
What talk? It was just a one-liner. This is called  splitting hair.

And people who claim to be revolutionaries might do better to develop a thicker skin.

The only advantage of being wrapped in cotton wool all your life is that the cover is highly combustible.
Posted: 11 years ago
Originally posted by SherlockHouse


They are depandant on media but not the glamour media which TV bahus are a part of.

😕
Posted: 11 years ago
What is the idea behind posting this particular pic of Urvashi, that too as a separate post?
  1  


Related Topics

No Related topics found

Topic Info

7 Participants 9 Replies 1355Views

Topic started by mahiya

Last replied by taurusbb

loader
loader
up-open TOP