Originally posted by -Ravjot-
@ mahkutty: I see your point there. Reminders
are given to members who otherwise follow the rules and if whatever they said was something minor (i.e. misinterpreted in which case we ask them to be careful of their wording). If it's something major like bashing/fighting etc. then that deserves a warning and warning levels are raised in extreme cases.
Ravjot, I really hope what you have said above is 100% correct in how a certain member gets warned for the warning level to be raised.
WL is raised only when there is lot of mud slinging going on with some abuses at each other. There was a recent incident with one of my friends where very unfairly was punished for no fault by one of your peers without any proper justification.
I will give the thread and the comments and nowhere those comments were abusive/sarcastic/derogatory, yet the mod chose to raise the warning level for unjustified reasons which left the member so disheartened that, that person is not using account much to see that WL displayed as punishment. It has demoralized and disheartened completely.
My question is in case of unreasonable WL raised why can't they be another appeal and a proper review and justice is given. I am okay with it if the decision is upheld after review, but let there be a proper channel as to one doesn't feel cheated by mod who at times gives an impression of being biased towards one group. In the end, any offense needs to be punished while the innocent should be saved from any unfair punishment. I will send the details with the thread and you can review it and take a call as to how WL was raised for no offense by that member nor there was any abuse/bashing.