our Hindu scriptures during foreign rule | Dwarkadheesh

page

Inactive

Posted: 12 years ago

the butter stealing story of lord Krishna seems to b pure fictional.its not mentioned in bhagavtam, vishnu puran or any other hindu scripture.

. will anyone tell me from where it originated?according to bhagvatam lord krishna's father had 9 lakh cows.

somebody have created this fictional story n others belive it even without any written proof.

apne hi bahgwaan ko badnaam karte hain indians.

Edited by queenindia - 12 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

425420

Inactive

Posted: 12 years ago

there r 3-4 layers of adulteration in the ved vyasa's mahabharat.

only a person who can read Sanskrit can understand that ,the style of writing of some shlokas is completely different from the sholka of core mahabhrat written by veda vyasa

3 or 4 different poets have contributed in additions of shlokas in mahabhrat at different time.

according to veda vyasa's core mahabhrat, lord krishna has only one wife rukmini.

the number of wives of krishna is different in different purans.

we have mixed all the stories.bhagvatam too is adulterated

16 thoussand wives is not in core mahabharat.

the problem with indians is that we have accepted all adulterations ,wihtout any research or intrest for knowing the truth.

n indians are publishing the copies of adelterated mahabhrat n telecasting it on tv .

vyasa was the tile given to a person who used to write purans n other scripture.

vyasa doesnt means veda vyasa who wrote mahabhrata..so differnet purans were written by differnt people.

some people used veda vysa name in purans for credibility.

Edited by queenindia - 11 years ago

Quote

425420

Inactive

Posted: 12 years ago

the story of indra dev demanded karna's kundal n kawach is not there in veda vyasa's mahabharat. this story is in villi bharatham...which has been written recently..we have mixed all the stories n think that all the fictional stories r true. n thus defame our own religion.

Quote

425420

Inactive

Posted: 12 years ago

our original scripture were burnt by greek(alenxander), muslims

invaders(from gaznavi ot mughals). n brtisihers took the remaining

scriptures away to Britain n got them translated n distorted by max muller,

who knew sanskrit.we have lost our orginal scriptures.takshashila n nalanda

universities were burnt many times.beef eatign n aryan invasion,akbar,

buddha, victoria, jesus all were put into our scriptures.

so we cannot b sure whether each n ervythign written in our scriptures really happed. bcoz many stoires were added later.

so those incidents which looks insensible can b rejected.

Quote

425420

Inactive

Posted: 12 years ago

uttar kand was a latter addition to ramayan,valmiki has not written it.so we should not add it to real story of ram n sita.

the agniparsikasha looks insensible, bcoz how can a human body not burn in fine.it may have asymbolic meaning.

there more 14-15 diff version of ramayan available all over the world

such ficiotnal stories distort n defame out avatars.

same happend with mahabhrat n bhagvatam too. so we have to stop beleiveng them blindly..

Quote

425420

Inactive

Posted: 12 years ago

krishna's butter stealign story comes from harivansh puran, which is a jain scriptures.

veda vysa's name is mentioned in this puran too. but how can he write jain scripture. Jainism originate much later.so definielty this scripture was written later.

it means jains have used his name .

Quote

Aradhana

@Aradhana87

IF-Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

This content was originally posted by: queenindia
uttar kand was a latter addition to ramayan,valmiki has not written it.so we should not add it to real story of ram n sita.
the agniparsikasha looks insensible, bcoz how can a human body not burn in fine.it may have asymbolic meaning.

there more 14-15 diff version of ramayan available all over the world
such ficiotnal stories distort n defame out avatars.

same happend with mahabhrat n bhagvatam too. so we have to stop beleiveng them blindly..

Even I heard that uttarkand was written much later. Can you tell me about agnipariksha?

Quote

425420

Inactive

Posted: 11 years ago

all Purans or Ramayan or Mahabharat are NOT spared from adulterations in last 1000 years of foreign rule by perverts who had the singular agenda of destroying the cultural foundations of this country.

There are several evidences of adulteration. For example:

1. Garud Puran Brahmakanda shloka1.59 states that in Kaliyuga many frauds are posing as Brahmins to remove certain shlokas and add new ones in Mahabharat.

2. Geeta Press Gorakhpur publishes Ramayan and Mahabharat and has marked a large number of shlokas as adulterated because they appear clearly out of context.
3. Mahabharat Shantiparva shloka 265.9, 4 itself states that Vedic texts clearly prohibit alcohol, fish and meat.

All these have been propagated by frauds who have added such verses in scriptures through deceit.

4.Bhavishya Puran has shlokas talking of Sunday, Monday etc. However these stories stop in late 19th century when printing became popular. This very clearly shows that shlokas continued to be added in this book.

Three editions of Ramayan are available today ' Dakshinatya, Pashchamottariya and Gaudiya which are different. Even Geetapress Gorakhpur has indicated many chapters as adulterated (Prakshipta). Most scholars agree that Balkanda and Uttarkanda are added later to valmiki ramyana.

Dr Surendra Kumar has written a detailed translation of Manu Smriti in Hindi that analyzes each shloka on various parameters to weed out those verses that are obviously interpolated.

He has deduced that of the 2685 shlokas of Manu Smriti, at least 1471 shlokas are adulterated. He has classified the adulterations as :

- out of subject

- out of context

- contradictory

- repetition

- difference in usage and style

http://agniveer.com/3308/manu-smriti-and-shudras/

Edited by queenindia - 11 years ago

Quote

Aradhana

@Aradhana87

IF-Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

Oh I did not know that Balkand is an addition also

Quote