Hello everyone and welcome to the Debate Mansion's Debating Championship competition.
The topic :" Is one Countries Terrorist another Countries freedom fighter ?"
Let me introduce the Contestants to you...
Arguing FOR the topic are:
Heart girl
Ms.BholiBhali
Mist
Arguing AGAINST the topic are:
Paki Princez
Jasunap
MKZara
Before we begin, let me reiterate the rules for this debate. Contestants are advised to make themselves familiar with the rules:
1)To abide by the rules of FAQ and post:"Important to all members of DM ".Please do read the 2 posts before starting the debate .
2)The opening argument will be given by Paki Princez who is speaking against the motion . It will be followed by a member who will argue against the motion and the debate will begin . Please wait for Paki Princez to start the debate before posting opposing argument.
3) Please recognise the members on your side of the team and only debate against the opposing team .
4) After the completion of 48 hours , the post will be locked and no further comments can be added or erased .
5) Only the contestants may particpate and post to this debate . Any other comments will be deleted by the Development team.
Date of the debating championship -4/5th February (Saturday evening/Sunday morning)2006 -
Time : At 9:30 P.M U.S (Eastern time )/ 8:00 A.M India time.
The Competition will last 48 hours , giving enough time for all particpants to respond from different time zones .
I would like to wish all the contestants the best of luck! May the best debator win!
NOTE: This topic is locked for the moment. It will be reopened by Aparna_BD in time for the debate at 9.30 PM EST/ 8.00 AM IST
Hi everyone....sorry to start off a whole half hour after the time...its ok...now we have 47.5 hrs😆
Is one Countries Terrorist another Countries freedom fighter?
The plane and simple answer to that is NO!
What is a terrorist? It's someone who causes destructions and kills; basically someone who enjoys violence. This statement alone is strong enough to say that the person is NOT a freedom fighter for anyone. A terrorist is a terrorist no matter where he goes. If a person has the guts to kill innocent people and consider it "honorable" then that person is disgusting and he does not have the power to fight for anyone's freedom-not even his own. He can claim to be fighting for the sake of his "country" or "religion" but it is the person's personal fetish of killing people. There is nothing good about killing people and a terrorist's actions cannot be justified by even his own countrymen.
[/quote]
but we dont carry out our emotions/feelings/anger or whatever else you want to call it. ok people may be able to kill but most sane people wont. sure i can stab a person with a knife or shoot someone and they are dead..but i would never do such a thing and neither would you. just because someone might be capable of doing something dusnt mean that they carry it out.
yes they should be considered terrorists
That is wrong...and the soldiers in Iraq are considered terrorists (by me) because they basically invaded another country and started a war with them. the war with Iraq was America's and Bush's stupidity. those soldiers CANNOT be titled as freedom fighters bucause what they are doing to the people of Iraq is not bringing the American's freedom...it does'nt have any effect on us. I dont know y they went to war...The war with Iraq was just an excuse to invade Iraq's oil supply and Bush wanted to avenge his dad's failure during the gulf war.
That is wrong...and the soldiers in Iraq are considered terrorists (by me) because they basically invaded another country and started a war with them. the war with Iraq was America's and Bush's stupidity. those soldiers CANNOT be titled as freedom fighters bucause what they are doing to the people of Iraq is not bringing the American's freedom...it does'nt have any effect on us. I dont know y they went to war...The war with Iraq was just an excuse to invade Iraq's oil supply and Bush wanted to avenge his dad's failure during the gulf war.
Ok thatz ur viewpoint that u consider them terrorrists But look at what the majority of American population thinks..They are appreciating bush's actions thatz y he is relected... Yes its bringing America freedom how?? Saddam captured.. wudnt u wana jst simply kill that person who had been torturing his citizens in his own country?? Saddam was a dictator..hadnt he created terror in the minds of people..imagine living under the rule of dictator--have dictators ever bn proved useful for a country no! they have always bn destructive.. Its not bringing "America any freedom' but its bringing this World freedom from the hands of those Brutal dictators who have always used disgusting ideas to rule over people and have denied the fundamental rights to a human being.. Iraqis were living a life of Slaves and US have saved them from Saddam but on the other side they have destroying the country as if they r gonna pay for the development.. Moreover, don u think the weapons of Mass Destruction that Saddam was building wud have created more terror in this world if he tried to use it? mayb this world wud have ended -- Ppl of Hiroshima nd Nagasaki are still suffering from the ww2 attack.. now tell me arnt they fighting for the freedom of these people who are leading a life slaves..
I think being a permanent member of UN, Us had taken the rite step but he was TOTALLy rong in destroying the whole country in search of One person...