"request the learned mediator to ascertain how much amount in fact is due and payable to the petitioners and other authorities."
This implies that the SC is going into the case only for the benefit of the 115 petitioners (panelists) who had filed the case under Solomon James & Others. It is also for the benefit of the governmental authorities who are claiming their dues. This amount Ashok has computed on his own tantamounts to Rs50 crore which has to be deposited with the Secretary General of the Supreme Court within two weeks of the order of the mediator, Retd. Chief Justice Lahoti. The print out of these dues are to be submitted to the mediator by Feb 11, 2011 by the EoW who has the same in its possession derived from the SAOL website being under its control. EoW had earlier stated via Aaj Tak TV that the list that it had showed dues of over Rs36,000 crores to all panelists (1.2 million), but now the list to be submitted to the mediator will only cover 115 stated panelists. This implies that other panelists will not even get their membership fees of 11k each (about Rs1300 crores in total). Their only hope is if and only if the mediator looks beyond the 115 panelists (petitioners). That is a big IF. The EXIT OPTION for new panelists who had not made any income whatsoever remains on paper only. The judgement makes no mention of any restarting of SAOL as being purely for the benefit of the 115 panelists who wanted their monies back from SAOL for which the Union of India and others were asked to do the needful. The "needful" in no way means getting ponzi scheme of SAOL restarted as had been interpreted by expert brainwasher, Mr. Ashok Bharwani.
This also implies that the herd of cattle that Ashok Bharwani has got at the website of AISPA are in for a deadly shock that their leader Ashok had been bluffing them all the while! I am sure they are going to turn onto him. This Ashok Bharwani had been thrown out of speakindiaonline.com for trying to promote his business in the initial stages where he had met a lot of opposition then from a Manas Robin who too like Jonathan James had wanted to form an association to file a case against SAOL in the SC.
