Originally posted by: Tani91I agree with you about the discussion thing?? I mean what else could they discuss after giving comments to the contestant?π exactly, thats why I'm saying why do they discuss the points??
they also shouldn't be doing a lot of things if following the DWTS format
-because the show has the be live,
-there has to be a live band performing
-the judges are WAY meaner,unbiased and bitchier on that show than on JDJ
-contestants are more whiner in DWTS (at least of what I saw of Kate Gosselin and Bristol Palin)
I don't think the judges will be mean and bitchier but the contestants might be whiner, πI'm glad that the judges aren't over the top mean (I mean its too early to say that but it doesn't seem to change). I wish however that the show was live atleast in India because then they would get rid of some of the editing issues with the playback clips and such....[in the grand premire they showed the SAME damn clip of Krusha clapping and Ragini smiling....the same damn one.....again they showed with Yana and Akhil too] tell me about it , its sooo annoying, they show the same clip over n over again and the same laughter sound π₯±but maybe since this time its mostly the serial crowd I guess doing a live show might be a bit impossible for them
but one good thing I like about JDJ comparing it to NB...is that the cameras focus all the time on the contestant...in NB the cameras used to focus on the contestant and back to judges.....I like that in JDJ we get the full performancethank god for that, we certainly don't want to look at the judges' faces and their reactions to the dance while the dance is going on.
Originally posted by: JustJmight be wondering if the dance worth giving marks ??π... jokes apart , welcome to desi version of DWTS, when it comes to indian stuff , we agree to everything every one disagree format , its dead funny , even after long eye to eye sort of discussions the marks r different
comment:
p_commentcount