Originally posted by mpc.sofar
@sarah1024 and pratts
If someone is X, calling him X is not abuse. It is fact.
By pratts' own logic, he/she actually
is a murderer just because I said so. But the logic is faulty. By my own logic, I don't call pratts a murderer.
pratts vehemently opposed this statement, hence he/she disagrees with his/her own logic.
That is exactly what I am saying. That logic is faulty. But it is pratts' logic, not mine. That logic states that anyone can say any rubbish and it must be true because a saying can be quoted in its defence without understanding it - "there is no smoke without fire".
Your logic misses the basic assumptions on which Pratt based his/her logic(the basic assumption was if MT's wife has left him for a reason there is quite a probability that her side of story is true as we are not aware of what has happened in their life before this BB)
You are equating your statement "Pratt is a murderer-it must be true"-to the above situation.....your logic can fit into this situation if you are:
1. Pratt's wife..
2. You left Pratt and are going towards divorce....because you think Pratt is a murderer
Since none of the assumptions is true...your logic is faulty.
Edited by hima_123 - 13 years ago
