Rashmi Sharma should not make a show with two female leads - Page 16

first of all I dint know this was RS show bcos I hate her all shows from uttran days, and I dint understand why she has to make one sister evil to glorify other cant both be good, like SSk both the sis was positive .

Originally posted by: StarshineHues

Excuse me ?

Originally posted by: flamenco

first of all I dint know this was RS show bcos I hate her all shows from uttran days, and I dint understand why she has to make one sister evil to glorify other cant both be good, like SSk both the sis was positive .

and ya teju is preety girl infact long back I ask this in someone post that why her character turn negative , I also want her character now to come on track, and they has to make her strong and get new hero for her.

Originally posted by: sam.

Rashmi sharma just cares about one thing and that is TRP's ,so she will do whatever necessary to get that and that's a fact ! And about people wanting teju to leave the serial ,teju is a mature individual she is not some kid if she is sticking to this show she must have a solid reason behind it ! And television industry is a ruthless industry it's pretty much out of sight out of mind syndrom here it's very tough to have a hit show and stay in the news and I am sure teju realizes that !

Originally posted by: Radhadreamlove

N plz don't get me wrong... I said VK is experienced than Namish... it doesn't mean m criticizing vk..n not all can be perfect in one thing...sometimes someone is better than u..VK is a mind blowing actor n m a fan indeed..but m a Namish fan more... n Namish is a choreographer, a dancer so to get mould in acting it'll take time...n did I say that vk was weak at beginning...he is a perfect actor n always was..
N before commenting about someone's job first think that nothing is easy...

N the point was not about acting experience.. it was about hard work... first plz read that post carefully before taking me wrong...

Originally posted by: lillylk

U may not hate her. Bt a lot many hd started hating her when she got negative track. Though they may nt hate teju bt ragini was hated by many even in the forum. U said her redemption track will start then ppl will start to like. For that she will have to work really hard n i know she wl be accepted. Bt helly has made her fan base now by all the good things given to her on a plate. Whereas teju wl have to work hard for it. Why? If both are equal then both shud have got equal chance. Bt here first raginj has to work hard to make ppl hate her then double hard to make ppl like her? W*F! Why? Ragini was promised for a positive lead n so she signed it. N then she the character took a negative turn. There was news that she was upset and wanted to leave. So arguement that if teju wud hv been upset she wud have left is not valid. She stayed coz there was contract. Then when contract ended she decided to leave bt then the CVs promised a positive track n then she stayed. So its not that she was ok with that track. If u see not many actors who have had a good image wanto do negative character. If u see smriti khanna also, she is nice girl. Friends with radhika. Bt just coz she played neg role in MATSH as ritika she used to get hate msgs. She had to clarify that her reel n real is different. N so i hv seen hate msgs to tejasvi also! I think smdays back only shakti arora who jas played a negative role in oavitra rishta n positive role in MATSH said in a intvw that the negatives n side roles dont get same treatment as leads. N here i signed an actress as lead n treating her as side role. Why was there even need to make ragini character bad? Hv u seen in any show lead role is shown as turning negative? So y for ragini? Just for swara? N in this show sanskar hs also been bad. Laksh has got a bad role. Ragini also played a bad role. So now to justify let make swara also bad. Then it wud justify. That all for hv been bad at sm phase. Ir hv grey sjades. Coz in life also there is no1 so mahaan. All have grey shades. Let the grey shades of swara b revealed. She is no angel to solve everything.

Originally posted by: lillylk

U may not hate her. Bt a lot many hd started hating her when she got negative track. Though they may nt hate teju bt ragini was hated by many even in the forum. U said her redemption track will start then ppl will start to like. For that she will have to work really hard n i know she wl be accepted. Bt helly has made her fan base now by all the good things given to her on a plate. Whereas teju wl have to work hard for it. Why? If both are equal then both shud have got equal chance. Bt here first raginj has to work hard to make ppl hate her then double hard to make ppl like her? W*F! Why? Ragini was promised for a positive lead n so she signed it. N then she the character took a negative turn. There was news that she was upset and wanted to leave. So arguement that if teju wud hv been upset she wud have left is not valid. She stayed coz there was contract. Then when contract ended she decided to leave bt then the CVs promised a positive track n then she stayed. So its not that she was ok with that track. If u see not many actors who have had a good image wanto do negative character. If u see smriti khanna also, she is nice girl. Friends with radhika. Bt just coz she played neg role in MATSH as ritika she used to get hate msgs. She had to clarify that her reel n real is different. N so i hv seen hate msgs to tejasvi also! I think smdays back only shakti arora who jas played a negative role in oavitra rishta n positive role in MATSH said in a intvw that the negatives n side roles dont get same treatment as leads. N here i signed an actress as lead n treating her as side role. Why was there even need to make ragini character bad? Hv u seen in any show lead role is shown as turning negative? So y for ragini? Just for swara? N in this show sanskar hs also been bad. Laksh has got a bad role. Ragini also played a bad role. So now to justify let make swara also bad. Then it wud justify. That all for hv been bad at sm phase. Ir hv grey sjades. Coz in life also there is no1 so mahaan. All have grey shades. Let the grey shades of swara b revealed. She is no angel to solve everything.

Originally posted by: tiny15

u mite b namish fan but that doesn't mean hes gud in acting.and its not abt being choreographer or sumthing else.there r many actors on TV who were not actors or rather were dancer etc but still better actor than namish.

and bcoz we can criticize namish's acting & not just namish but any1 who"ll perform badly.so don't preach 2 oders wat 2 do or not 2 do.

and commenting on sum1's job is done wen performance is not proper.wen u r in that job then make sure 2 put efforts in that & also b ready 4 criticism.

and i'd read ur post then only i replied. i don't reply if i'dn't read any post.so i know wat u wrote & wat u meant.and accordingly gave reply.