Confused between modes of portrayal?

What exactly is this show aiming to be? Subtle, understated and life-like, OR:
Larger-than-life, action-and-melodrama-ish?

Writers, don't keep ping-ponging between the two. Choose ONE.

I hope they settle to subtle and life like soon. 😊

why should they settle for one...there is beauty in both...there are ppl who like subtle and there are those who like loud...some scenes call for subtle and some demand loud...as long as that is taken care...both is good...

I'm talking about the portions where the two clash with each other. For e.g., the Vande Mataram sequence was jarring and jingoistic.

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

I'm talking about the portions where the two clash with each other. For e.g., the Vande Mataram sequence was jarring and jingoistic.

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

Yes I'm Indian. 😆

I agree. And I think there were a few of us who were starting to get annoyed with it. I think they have done the granduer bit, now time to focus on the story and the emotional quotient.

yes, I want to see the story told now
in a beautiful way sans the violence and melodrama.

ok, given the premise of the show -- that he's a soldier and there is illegal activity galore,
that the Thakur-BSD fight is a central thread of the show,
and that Rudra is such a dark, angry damaged soul, almost a beast on the outside. So violence is a leitmotif, but can it move to the background now? as a backdrop, and be shown in an understated, parsimonious way when necessary, but not in your face!

Waiting to see how the emotions are tackled, how they are felt, experienced, expressed and how love finds room to eventually blossom in this barren landscape of their hearts.