Posted:
is it only me, i've always wondered just because a guy fills ur maang u r supposd to be married to him? here because geet wanted to belonng to maan the gesture was acceptable, though i felt it was in keeping with the retro theme. this is 2010 yaar, if filling the sindaoor rekha is marriage, then wud u accept it if any lafanga did it to u?
so, i being a todays woman, frown upon this supposed marriage. i thought maan sigh khurana was a sophisticated man. ... this gesture was totally against that image. so u had to support ur love before everybody, allevate her status when NT as good as pointed out that she was a fallen woman...but a proposal of marriage in front of the whole crowd shud hav done the trick,no?a tender gesture of a hug from behind with his hands encircling the baby? protecting him/her, accepting her( bcoz i want the baby to be a girl). goon bhari maang zaroori de kya? for drama may be...again it was done without geets approval. poor geet she had too many shocks for a day!!
i do hope there will be a real marriage.
an after thought i felt a bit sorry for NT, we regard her as the cheif villian.......but isn't dev equally a villian, may be more? coz dev seducing with geet was never a part of the orginal plan. and i feel that was the biggest betrayal. and now just because dev repents ( that too only when he realised geet is maans misti) he becomes the good guy and deserves meera!! what NT did to harm geet and her child is bad but i don't like it that dev is graced with a romance!
please post ur comments
Anupamaa
617