PYAAR KI KAHANI 28.11 - Page 16

Originally posted by: missFiesty_69

@red: she's not my favourite I think I have called her out enough to avoid these allegations but you do you. Idc what people think.

I guess I wasn't clear. It is not ludicrous exactly. For kidnapping, you have to prove intent. You need to prove that Abhira was malicious and intended to harm the kid for it to qualify as 'kidnapping.' Intent doesn't play as major a role unless the case involves ransom or coercion, but it cannot be wholly ignored.

You cannot simply accuse someone of kidnapping. You need to prove a lot of things before the court can charge them. Many cases have been overturned because they weren't able to prove intent to harm or defraud, etc.

If you cannot, then it's a false claim. You can seek damages in court for false claims, which is also why I added that she needs a good attorney.

Ab did kidnap someone kid to pass off as her own and if the FIR was not der and if krishwas not der .. probably both ar and ab would have run off ...what are u saying

Trying to pass of ru kid as her own is worst sin ..she knew the kid is ru

Don't say she gave dakshu back ..she did only coz the FIR

So many pankas said ru does not deserve..all should make her give dakshu ..coz so called leads are good

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

She is #1 rage baiter, I wonder if people actually like her

I don't like her , never watched Anupama but she has a personality, she is every where with her " hit dialogues "...Like she is every where.......without watching I know her dialogue from " Aap ko kya" to " surry "

Rage biter or not she is " super hit" ...Dadi ban gayi still full masthi

Originally posted by: missFiesty_69

No, Abhira won't be prosecuted. She did not kidnap the child according to the law, because the child's father himself consented to the baby being in Abhira's care. If Ruhi decides to sue Abhira, pehle Rohit hi phasega because he didn't take consent from his wife. After that, it will be Armaan, and then Ab. Also, Abhira can claim temporary depression for her actions. The other two will be the ones who will have to face jail time.

As far as I understand the law, with a good lawyer, (not someone like Armaan) not only will the case be overturned, but Abhira can also countersue Ruhi for defamation of character lol.

No acc to law , true rohit phasega and armann

Ab can't sue ru for defamation..it's not that easy ..ru can prove that ab ar have always been after her..ab as the wedding planner and then ar breach of promise

The way ab bearted her for being a housewife

The way she put dakshu in harm the masala kand

Even running away with kid and then causing all that choas

The rest also will be in trouble for taking dakshu to ab

Ab can't claim depression so easily..she did fight in court and win

She did run away and came back due to fir

The level peep go to normalise this behaviour

I was tolerant of this lead but this kand made me come back to if vocally

Nothing justify what ab ar did ..ru can prove with dna he is hers easily

And fact that ab tried to claim that kid as hers is as per law wrong more imp ethically

Originally posted by: Phir_Mohabbat

Verbal consent of Rohit doesn't matter in India law iirc. Also it could be emotional manipulation in a sensitive moment legally too ruhi would get daksh

Oh yea 😅🥰 ..rohit can always backtrack 😂

He can claim ar manipulated him

Originally posted by: missFiesty_69

Ruhi will anyway get Daksh because she's the biological mother. Unless she's physically abusive or unable to care for her kid financially, even then court will consider her as the first preference. She has to be mentally unwell for the court to not rule in her favour.

@b: verbal consent matters if anyone can bear witness to the fact, otherwise it doesn't. If they can prove that Rohit gave consent, then the case won't stand.

They have no witness tbh 😅

Also if we talk about witness, entire family + abhir was witness that baby was of Ruhis. Not sure is Manish goenka was there but enough evidence

Also when bageera ran away with kid it was a news that came in tv. That's how a gang of goons recognised bageera and were after her. Its already a case which is filed as an FIR in police.

I must confess i have a soft spot for ru

But will never justify her mistakes or kands

Ab I call out more coz she has a fam connect

Despite losing ro she did so much

But what they did romance in front of her

Did not even give the option to terminate

Did not let her grieve

Micro managed her pregnancy

The way ar changed doc ab did not even protest

But ru gave away theirs without any look back

Now having a dignified life with her dakshu

Originally posted by: AnjuRish

No acc to law , true rohit phasega and armann

Ab can't sue ru for defamation..it's not that easy ..ru can prove that ab ar have always been after her..ab as the wedding planner and then ar breach of promise

The way ab bearted her for being a housewife

The way she put dakshu in harm the masala kand

Even running away with kid and then causing all that choas

The rest also will be in trouble for taking dakshu to ab

Ab can't claim depression so easily..she did fight in court and win

She did run away and came back due to fir

The level peep go to normalise this behaviour

I was tolerant of this lead but this kand made me come back to if vocally

Nothing justify what ab ar did ..ru can prove with dna he is hers easily

And fact that ab tried to claim that kid as hers is as per law wrong more imp ethically

Ab never had depression on top of that she mocked Ruhi & Abir calling trauma kids ...

Ab was reckless,& careless with the baby without completing immunisation she exposed the new born to all kind of " risks"..crowded court rooms , masala kand then while the baby with her got in to trouble with gangsters....

If the case went to court Arman would defenitly get punished Rohit too, Ab can be charged for " child negligence "..She too ran away with Daksh.

A child is not a property belong to their parents or any one .Rohit had no right to give away the baby at any circumstances

It is a crime because court will look from the child's point of view ...Daksh was denied a chance to be with his biological mother ...Ruhi also was denied her baby...

Originally posted by: AnjuRish

No acc to law , true rohit phasega and armann

Ab can't sue ru for defamation..it's not that easy ..ru can prove that ab ar have always been after her..ab as the wedding planner and then ar breach of promise

The way ab bearted her for being a housewife

The way she put dakshu in harm the masala kand

Even running away with kid and then causing all that choas

The rest also will be in trouble for taking dakshu to ab

Ab can't claim depression so easily..she did fight in court and win

She did run away and came back due to fir

The level peep go to normalise this behaviour

I was tolerant of this lead but this kand made me come back to if vocally

Nothing justify what ab ar did ..ru can prove with dna he is hers easily

And fact that ab tried to claim that kid as hers is as per law wrong more imp ethically

What exactly am I normalizing?

Technically, Ruhi was also hitting on Armaan despite knowing he was a married man.

I don't remember ever stating that Abhira's actions were right. There is a legal distinction between an action that is malicious and pre-meditated and an action that is impulsive. I merely tried to explain that.

Even corporates have begun granting time off for miscarriage because the recovery process—both physical and emotional—is significant.

Because this shitty show and it's even more shitty writers haven't shown someone after a miscarriage not being depressed or in trauma, it doesn't mean it shouldn't / does not exist. Also I wanted to highlight the legal points. I don't give a heck about what happens in the show, or not.

My original response was in response to a user suggesting Ruhi could have sued Abhira, for which I said she couldn't have, because kidnapping a serious charge where it's crucial to prove intent. I mentioned defamation also in that context.

If you have a different opinion or think otherwise, I have nothing more to say. You are entitled to your opinion.

Originally posted by: missFiesty_69

What exactly am I normalizing?

Technically, Ruhi was also hitting on Armaan despite knowing he was a married man.

I don't remember ever stating that Abhira's actions were right. There is a legal distinction between an action that is malicious and pre-meditated and an action that is impulsive. I merely tried to explain that.

Even corporates have begun granting time off for miscarriage because the recovery process—both physical and emotional—is significant.

Because this shitty show and it's even more shitty writers haven't shown someone after a miscarriage not being depressed or in trauma, it doesn't mean it shouldn't / does not exist. Also I wanted to highlight the legal points. I don't give a heck about what happens in the show, or not.

My original response was in response to a user suggesting Ruhi could have sued Abhira, for which I said she couldn't have, because kidnapping a serious charge where it's crucial to prove intent. I mentioned defamation also in that context.

If you have a different opinion or think otherwise, I have nothing more to say. You are entitled to your opinion.

Sorry.

😭😭😭😭