A woman reason behind a man straying - Page 2

I swear they better not show a consummation scene out of the blue. First of all they haven't even said I love you to each other, or heck communicate properly and they would want us to believe Sai slept with him.

Today Pakhi's face, her accusations, her body language everything was disgusting. Let's see her reaction if one day she has to face what Sai is going through. Of course she would be over the moon if Samrat cheats on her. I feel like the old Shivani would've blasted her, even old Mohit would have but it's the writing that's obviously inconsistent. WTF dialogues must be written specially to bring out her oscar level acting.

Bhavani was not really surprising, it's her backward thinking that a woman is always responsible if a guy can't keep it in his pants. At this rate I'm pretty sure she will accept Sahas and Shruti with open arms, to save their image and cuz of the ready made heir.

I never understood the concept of another woman being called a homewrecker. What is this husband? A child? Another woman came, gave him his favourite candy and he decided to go with her, forgetting all his vows and promises that he had made to someone else? Definitely not saying a woman pursuing a man already committed is not wrong! By all means, it is. But then why does society so conveniently forget, that the moral obligation of keeping one's relationship intact, solely belongs to the two committed individuals and not the outsiders? Statements like, "man will be man", "oh but she should have controlled herself", "the woman was a wh*re/ sl*t/ homewrecker", "she was asking for it", " she preyed on him" etc come from the very society we live in. The difference is that, for men, it is used as a justification for their behaviour but for women, it is to disgrace them and tell the whole world how downgraded the women race can be! Man, compared to a loose charging bull is such praise for them but a woman has to be a robot, welcoming of all notions and be void of all emotions and just take everything as it comes to them without a single complaint or hesitancy! The saddest part is usually a woman is degraded by another woman and excuses for a man's behaviour is given by the same! 😔

p.s. I do not know the context of your post but it did make my blood boil reading that one woman was degrading another on such a level.

First these so called directors must understand women are not toys for man to play with rather than showing ema and domestic abuse in the name of reality....woman is not a supernatural thing to hand both professional and household works...why can't they show husband helping wife in cutting vegetables and washing plates and utensils...these things happens in many families...but for itv patriarchal families get highlighted....if a man find pleasure in other woman ....its his immoral traits...why to blame a wife...and what is wrong if a girl does second marriage after being divorced...why society expect her to accept her husband even after the man have a child in other women...a man is encouraged to marry second time after wife's death to look after the children but same society expect mother to raise the child all along...but now a days these are changing...these things are needed to reach masses than all these regressive crap in the name of awarness....its a discussion among couple when to have a child...its should be bought to the world when couple is prepared...not under pressure of elders ..even gov promote it through ads....if virat and sai have a child just after bk nonsense...many will get a wrong message ...we may enjoy virat's advance towards sai when she is not conscious about her feeling...but imagine a husband's physical advance towards wife without her consent... doesn't it fall under marital rape...

Originally posted by: Chir-Cute

I never understood the concept of another woman being called a homewrecker. What is this husband? A child? Another woman came, gave him his favourite candy and he decided to go with her, forgetting all his vows and promises that he had made to someone else? Definitely not saying a woman pursuing a man already committed is not wrong! By all means, it is. But then why does society so conveniently forget, that the moral obligation of keeping one's relationship intact, solely belongs to the two committed individuals and not the outsiders? Statements like, "man will be man", "oh but she should have controlled herself", "the woman was a wh*re/ sl*t/ homewrecker", "she was asking for it", " she preyed on him" etc come from the very society we live in. The difference is that, for men, it is used as a justification for their behaviour but for women, it is to disgrace them and tell the whole world how downgraded the women race can be! Man, compared to a loose charging bull is such praise for them but a woman has to be a robot, welcoming of all notions and be void of all emotions and just take everything as it comes to them without a single complaint or hesitancy! The saddest part is usually a woman is degraded by another woman and excuses for a man's behaviour is given by the same! 😔

p.s. I do not know the context of your post but it did make my blood boil reading that one woman was degrading another on such a level.

The fact that I hate about this show is that three women, independent and different in their own ways have fallen and given a chance would fight for a SC*MBAG like Virat.

Originally posted by: dairymilkanu

First these so called directors must understand women are not toys for man to play with rather than showing ema and domestic abuse in the name of reality....woman is not a supernatural thing to hand both professional and household works...why can't they show husband helping wife in cutting vegetables and washing plates and utensils...these things happens in many families...but for itv patriarchal families get highlighted....if a man find pleasure in other woman ....its his immoral traits...why to blame a wife...and what is wrong if a girl does second marriage after being divorced...why society expect her to accept her husband even after the man have a child in other women...a man is encouraged to marry second time after wife's death to look after the children but same society expect mother to raise the child all along...but now a days these are changing...these things are needed to reach masses than all these regressive crap in the name of awarness....its a discussion among couple when to have a child...its should be bought to the world when couple is prepared...not under pressure of elders ..even gov promote it through ads....if virat and sai have a child just after bk nonsense...many will get a wrong message ...we may enjoy virat's advance towards sai when she is not conscious about her feeling...but imagine a husband's physical advance towards wife without her consent... doesn't it fall under marital rape...

I truly think vanker is a sadist... What kind of a dialogues are these

Originally posted by: asmi_joya

The fact that I hate about this show is that three women, independent and different in their own ways have fallen and given a chance would fight for a SC*MBAG like Virat.

Couldn't have agreed more. No matter how much sairat crap they shove down the audience's throat there is no denial that 3 strong female characters got butchered just to maintain the ML's mahaanta who by the way is the trashiest of the trash. 🤔

Originally posted by: Chir-Cute

I never understood the concept of another woman being called a homewrecker. What is this husband? A child? Another woman came, gave him his favourite candy and he decided to go with her, forgetting all his vows and promises that he had made to someone else? Definitely not saying a woman pursuing a man already committed is not wrong! By all means, it is. But then why does society so conveniently forget, that the moral obligation of keeping one's relationship intact, solely belongs to the two committed individuals and not the outsiders? Statements like, "man will be man", "oh but she should have controlled herself", "the woman was a wh*re/ sl*t/ homewrecker", "she was asking for it", " she preyed on him" etc come from the very society we live in. The difference is that, for men, it is used as a justification for their behaviour but for women, it is to disgrace them and tell the whole world how downgraded the women race can be! Man, compared to a loose charging bull is such praise for them but a woman has to be a robot, welcoming of all notions and be void of all emotions and just take everything as it comes to them without a single complaint or hesitancy! The saddest part is usually a woman is degraded by another woman and excuses for a man's behaviour is given by the same! 😔

p.s. I do not know the context of your post but it did make my blood boil reading that one woman was degrading another on such a level.

Exactly in this whole scenario the women like Bk, Ashwini and others except Sai have degraded Shruti and the men have as well, on the way women talk about Shruti in a demeaning tone is so so extremely distasteful.

In fact I dont see her wrong here, she got help from a man, who is willing to leave his family for the vaada he gave to her husband and she choses to accept that help. On her part she did try to mend things, but onus should never be on her to sort it out. The man, Virat is at fault here. Similarly the members of the family, who blame Sai for Virat going stray or SHruti again for "enticing" Virat , Vankar should be shameful for showing it all.

The only silver lining her is Sai atleast has been shown to be respectful towards Shruti even when she is the one who has been cheated on.

I have also mentioned how Virat is extremely responsible for the way she turned out to be. He got out the worst in her.

Originally posted by: asmi_joya

The fact that I hate about this show is that three women, independent and different in their own ways have fallen and given a chance would fight for a SC*MBAG like Virat.

Same. It's so unrealistic when the character is so shitty and the ML looks like THAT. Make it believable atleast 😆

Originally posted by: asmi_joya

Exactly in this whole scenario the women like Bk, Ashwini and others except Sai have degraded Shruti and the men have as well, on the way women talk about Shruti in a demeaning tone is so so extremely distasteful.

In fact I dont see her wrong here, she got help from a man, who is willing to leave his family for the vaada he gave to her husband and she choses to accept that help. On her part she did try to mend things, but onus should never be on her to sort it out. The man, Virat is at fault here. Similarly the members of the family, who blame Sai for Virat going stray or SHruti again for "enticing" Virat , Vankar should be shameful for showing it all.

The only silver lining her is Sai atleast has been shown to be respectful towards Shruti even when she is the one who has been cheated on.

I have also mentioned how Virat is extremely responsible for the way she turned out to be. He got out the worst in her.

This character has left nothing but a very bitter taste in my mouth. No amount of redemption or sairat etc will alter my feelings for him anymore. In fact, sairat was over for me way long ago!