Division in 4 groups - what was the logic - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

11

Views

823

Users

5

Frequent Posters

vanajaakshi thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#11
Public voting reduces these shows entirely to a popularity contest. And the second factor is who is willing to spend a whole lot of money to vote. It is not a substitute even for squabbling judges.
anonmember thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: smallwonder

division in groups is not fair... coz in this case, u r forced to select 3 singers from each group even if they r not good... and some good ones will be left out from others coz there might be more good ones clubbed in that group... they shud have had a system like in ii where they heard all contestants in theater rounds (in groups of 2-3 singing duets) and then took a decision on a whole after hearing all of them...




Agreed. What if one group of singers is stronger than the others? The judges can only select three singers. II format is better where the judges could hear all the contestants in the theater round (though that one round had a lot of drama) and then again in the piano round. ASVOI format could have been better.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".