Originally posted by koolsadhu1000 I believe...
Love is independent of sex, relation ,or age just as God or the supreme energy is independent of sex , attributes or a body .
In this sense ...love is too magnificent an emotion to be be controlled by the physical form or relation to a person . One can love a mother , father , brother , lover , God or anyone as the flow is natural . Since love has nothing to do with physical form but is a state of mind ...it cannot be said that the love for a woman is different from the love for a man .
Love is a very sattvic emotion .
When one loves one feels like sacrificing for the one you love . One does not sacrifice the loved one .
One wants to see the one you love happy and cannot bear unhappiness on his or her face .
What about Ovi? She obviously can not only bear to see pain on Arjun's face but can ignore it or be oblivious about it.
I saw these aspects in Arjun's love for Purvi . I did not see any of these aspects in Purvi's love for Arjun .
I saw these aspects in her love for her mother . She could not bear her unhappiness . She sacrificed Arjun for her ...her personal happiness for her .
She used a man who was in love with her to secure happiness for her mother .
She constantly thought of her future even at the peak of her happiness .
This is love . Purvi loved the woman who adopted her deeply with a profound sense of gratitude .
Who is deluded that its a 'love story' ?😆😆 Arjun Purvi or Ovi ? Perception for you .
Purvi's capacity for 'doing for a man' was amply demonstrated . I am afraid she will never be truly able to give her 100% to any man but she will give her all to her mother just the way Archana lived only asSulochana's beti .
For me the thought counts too ...very much infact . Touching a man directly only does not amount to an extra marital affair. Caressing him or embracing him mentally is immoral in my opinion . I can understand the pain of breaking up ...i cannot understand the continuance of the love mentally with such caresses , kisses and embraces . Weep all you want for breaking up but don't even think of him that way once he is married . It is nothing but your moral degradation ...showly but surely .
I totally disagree, the man was to have been her husband. I will never be convinced that she is immoral in caressing the picture of a man who was to have been hers, body, mind and soul. When ready to give Ovi and Archana time to deal, why be so stingy with Purvi in giving her time to deal with her angst? A few rites of marriage may have made Arjun legally Ovi's husband but he is Purvi's and always will be. You can touch, caress a person's face with no lust involved, just as a mother/sister touch their loved ones, to judge her touch as lust is wrong.
To me Ovi's obsession for Purvi's fiance seemed like lust, immoral. Hankering after another's fiance so much as to buy him out, barter him finally that is immoral.
But then my thoughts are a dinosaur's thoughts as i said in my thread . One really should not give them a second thought nowdays . I cannot think of anyway but this way ...such is my mental make up . Ignore me guys ,😆😆
___________________________________________________________________________
Kool, would love to ignore you.😆 See @ red. But will ask your dinosaur's thoughts to dwell on this, do you really honestly think Ovi was right in what she did? Please give no thought to the fact that she is an ARMAN kid but objectively speaking if your child did this, would you be okay? I would not, even if the other girl involved was not my daughter, I would be flabbergasted by my daughter (Ovi's)'s atrocious, selfish behavior and based on that alone would tell her to free the man. My response to Kalapi about making the marriage work would fly out the window, that response was based on only if she had no hand in the treachery. I am talking in a real life scenario if it were in fact my own daughter.
Edited by soapwatcher1 - 13 years ago