Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread 7 - Page 36

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.2k

Views

36.9k

Users

15

Likes

1.7k

Frequent Posters

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar


FP behen, why are you blushing?😆

Was this a blushing emocon?


Lagta hai dil ki baat zubaan pe I mean emocon me aa gayi. Suddenly I have started liking Lakshman n Dusshashan's son

If I get a time machine now, and Sahdev denies marrying me, Dusshashan's son would be the second option n Lakshman third.


Abhimanyu ko to I consider as my son, so pretty platonic relation

Agni_Jytsona thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Was this a blushing emocon?


Lagta hai dil ki baat zubaan pe I mean emocon me aa gayi. Suddenly I have started liking Lakshman n Dusshashan's son

If I get a time machine now, and Sahdev denies marrying me, Dusshashan's son would be the second option n Lakshman third.


Abhimanyu ko to I consider as my son, so pretty platonic relation

Why?? 😆

1123225 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

1. Yudhishtira wasn't impotent. He simply had no money or clout. Whatever he had came from wife and in-laws or his brothers. He wasn't in a position to say no.


He in fact tells Drupada that he would obey him whatever the command.


2. Subhadra couldn't be married to Yudhishtira to beget heir because Panchali had to accept the kid because of Panchal.


Panchali adopting Abhimanyu as heir is one thing, but Panchal was hardly likely to accept Yudhishtira's son with another queen (Subhadra) on whom Panchali had no legal right.


Plus, Arjuna-Subhadra alliance wasn't exactly planned. My best guess would be that Krishna figured out the heir issue and needed a solution which didn't involve Yudhishtira marrying again which would take power out of the Yadava-Panchal-Pandava axis

Edited by HearMeRoar - 5 years ago
1123225 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Was this a blushing emocon?


Lagta hai dil ki baat zubaan pe I mean emocon me aa gayi. Suddenly I have started liking Lakshman n Dusshashan's son

If I get a time machine now, and Sahdev denies marrying me, Dusshashan's son would be the second option n Lakshman third.


Abhimanyu ko to I consider as my son, so pretty platonic relation


🤣

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

😁

Yaar think of it Lakshman confronted Abhimanyu when even Dronacharya was avoiding him


Dusshashan's son went for one to one fight with him when the top commanders were attacking Abhimanyu simultaneously.


Maybe they weren't very good warriors but this shows they were high in spirit and dedication to their side n victory


I know they are ignored but I genuinely admire their thought process.


Sahdev to was the best husband of the era, undoubtedly the first choice


My husband is completely irritated by my Mahabharata obsession he is like tum jaaogi to Duryodhan hi milega tumko shaadi karne ko

Armu4eva thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

😁


My husband is completely irritated by my Mahabharata obsession he is like tum jaaogi to Duryodhan hi milega tumko shaadi karne ko

🤣🤣

Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago

Abhimanyu was definitely not a heir to Panchali or Pandavas 4 sure. Panchal or king drupad will never agree 4 yadav heir , when krishna was not knowing reason arjun's exile then how will he know about heir problem . He is out of question.


Vedvyas or any other great saint never made any prediction that arjun will produce a heir 4 Yudi & draupadi.


King yudhishthira will never wait for 7 - 8 for a heir , he will marry other woman 4 heir.


Bheem was yuvraj , & he considered fav brother of Yudi , even Panchali trust bheem d most , if Panchali has to go 4 adoption best option is bheem's son. Bheem had other son name sarvang from kashi princess jalandhara.


It had been said bheem performed 1000 soma yagnas 2 begot a son from draupadi..


I agree with preet that Abhimanyu was said as heir coz of yadav domainance.


Neither krishna ever proposed Abhimanyu as heir.


Abhimanyu was definitely not adopted nor heir to anyone .

Edited by deepikagupta9 - 5 years ago
Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago

Did anyone saw shri krishna draupadi's swayamber.


Duryodhana fell down with bow on top of him.🤣🤣🤣

Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago

Prativindhya was also known as dharamputra


Drishtdumya was known as draupada.

Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago

😁

Yaar think of it Lakshman confronted Abhimanyu when even Dronacharya was avoiding him


Dusshashan's son went for one to one fight with him when the top commanders were attacking Abhimanyu simultaneously.


Maybe they weren't very good warriors but this shows they were high in spirit and dedication to their side n victory


I know they are ignored but I genuinely admire their thought process.


Sahdev to was the best husband of the era, undoubtedly the first choice


My husband is completely irritated by my Mahabharata obsession he is like tum jaaogi to Duryodhan hi milega tumko shaadi karne ko

[/QUOTE

Tum maharaj ki jai serial se time machine rent pe le lo , vaha ja kar Sahdev se mil lo.


Vaise maine read kiya Sahdev 2 had many wives😆

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".