'Mahabharat- Different Versions -Perspectives' - Page 81

Purity factor was Shalva's excuse. Bhishma nd Vichitravirya did not raise that issue.

Just wondering - if Bhishma Amba union happened, would their son have ascended throne or Vichitravirya's son?

Originally posted by: shindes

Purity factor was Shalva's excuse. Bhishma nd Vichitravirya did not raise that issue.

Vichitraviryya refused to marry Amba, I had posted Rajaji translated citation previous page

Rajaji's retelling has inaccuracies like? His work is mainly based on Dakshinatya , which is independent of northern recension, but also used 21 recensions , combining both north and south recensions .

She returned to Hastinapura and told Bhishma of what had taken place. The grandsire tried to induce Vichitravirya to marry her. But Vichitravirya roundly refused to marry a maiden whose heart had already been given to another.

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" color="#006600">inaccuracies like divine babies of Kunti Madri were born the same day.. they dint live in the womb for 9 months.. and it is more of a condensed version than a translation..</font>

Really? You mean all 3 born together like triplets? Weird!
As for 9 months controversy it must be because they insist on their celestial mode of birth.

Originally posted by: shindes

Really? You mean all 3 born together like triplets? Weird!
As for 9 months controversy it must be because they insist on their celestial mode of birth.

Serials also show it that way 😆 of course Madri has children after Kunti's; babies gifted as soon as mantra recitation ends 😛😆